Neural circuit models for evidence accumulation through choice-selective sequences

Decision making is traditionally thought to be mediated by neurons that accumulate evidence through persistent activity. However, recent decision-making experiments in rodents have observed neurons across the brain that fire sequentially, rather than persistently, with the subset of neurons in the sequence depending on the animal's choice. We developed two candidate circuit models in which neurons are active sequentially and transfer evidence faithfully to the next active population. One model encodes evidence in the relative firing of two competing chains of neurons, and the other in the network location of a stereotyped, bump-like pattern of neural activity. Neural recordings from four brain regions during an evidence accumulation task revealed that different regions displayed evidence tuning consistent with different candidate models. This work provides a mechanistic explanation for how graded information may be precisely accumulated within and transferred between neural populations, and suggests that different brain regions may accumulate evidence through different circuit mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70267-9
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural circuit models for evidence accumulation through choice-selective sequences

Edward H. Nieh, Scott S. Bolkan, Ilana B. Witten, Manuel Schottdorf et al.
Nature Communications
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Neural circuit models for evidence accumulation through choice-selective sequences

Edward H. Nieh, Scott S. Bolkan, Ilana B. Witten, Manuel Schottdorf, Lindsey S. Brown, Mark S. Goldman, Jounhong Ryan Cho, Carlos D. Brody, David W. Tank
article en

Abstract

Decision making is traditionally thought to be mediated by neurons that accumulate evidence through persistent activity. However, recent decision-making experiments in rodents have observed neurons across the brain that fire sequentially, rather than persistently, with the subset of neurons in the sequence depending on the animal's choice. We developed two candidate circuit models in which neurons are active sequentially and transfer evidence faithfully to the next active population. One model encodes evidence in the relative firing of two competing chains of neurons, and the other in the network location of a stereotyped, bump-like pattern of neural activity. Neural recordings from four brain regions during an evidence accumulation task revealed that different regions displayed evidence tuning consistent with different candidate models. This work provides a mechanistic explanation for how graded information may be precisely accumulated within and transferred between neural populations, and suggests that different brain regions may accumulate evidence through different circuit mechanisms.

Nature Communications
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US), Princeton University (US), University of Virginia (US), University of California, Davis (US), University of Delaware (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.