283P Comparison of CT and PET/CT for treatment response assessment after 2 years of chemo-immunotherapy or immunotherapy in lung cancer patients

Background: Accurate target volume delineation in radiotherapy in non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is based on integration of CT and [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG) PET.PET imaging with fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) enables visualization of FAP.This study evaluated [ 18 F]FDG-vs.[ 18 F]FAPI-74 PET/CT for target volume delineation.Methods: 40 patients with histologically confirmed advanced/recurrent lung cancer underwent both [ 18 F]FDG and [ 18 F]FAPI-74 PET/CT before radiotherapy.Tumor uptake was quantified using tumor-to-background ratios (tumor SUVmax / SUVmean of mediastinal blood pool).After excluding PET-negative cases, 33 datasets were analyzed.CT-based gross tumor volumes (GTV_CT) were compared with semiautomatically segmented PET-derived GTVs using absolute background-based thresholds (SUV 1.5-, 2.-, 2.5-, or 3-fold blood pool SUVmean).Thoracic metabolic tumor volumes (MTV_thoracic) and FAPI-avid tumor volume (FTV_thoracic) were assessed using relative, per-lesion thresholds, i.e., 42% isocontour of the local lesion SUVmax.Data are reported as median (1 st -3 rd quartile; Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm correction).Results: Median tumor-to-background ratio was higher for [ 18 F]FAPI-74 than for [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT (4 [2.6-5.1]vs 3.8 [2.6-7.4],p = 0.8).Median GTV_CT was 94.3 cm 3 (36.8-177.8).With a threshold of 1.5, median FDG-and FAPI-derived GTVs were 28 cm 3 (10.7-90.4) and 31.3 cm 3 (18-75).At thresholds of 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0, median FDG-derived GTVs were 22 cm 3 (4.3-61.5),11.3 cm 3 (1.5-43), and 6.7 cm 3 (0.2-37.4, vs. 15 cm 3 (5.6-48), 9 cm 3 (1.6-31), and 3.4 cm 3 (0.4-14) for FAPI, respectively.FDGand FAPI-derived GTVs did not differ at any threshold (Holm-adjusted p 0.05).All PET-derived GTVs were significantly smaller than GTV_CT (p < 0.001), including in patients who did not undergo prior systemic therapy.Median MTV_thoracic and FTV_thoracic were 19.2 cm 3 (10-45) and 18.8 cm 3 (11-33.7);p = 0.2.Conclusions: [ 18 F]-FAPI-74-PET/CT shows favorable tumor-to-background uptake in lung cancer.PET-derived semiautomatically delineated GTVs differ substantially from CT-based GTVs, irrespective of use of prior systemic therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106592
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

283P Comparison of CT and PET/CT for treatment response assessment after 2 years of chemo-immunotherapy or immunotherapy in lung cancer patients

Marta Manso, Marta Ciprés, Rogelio A Aguado, A.V. Ospina Serrano et al.
ESMO Open
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

283P Comparison of CT and PET/CT for treatment response assessment after 2 years of chemo-immunotherapy or immunotherapy in lung cancer patients

Marta Manso, Marta Ciprés, Rogelio A Aguado, A.V. Ospina Serrano, M. Izquierdo, Roberto Serna-Blasco, A. Collazo Lorduy, R. Jimeno, M. Martinez Cutillas, Y. Tisner, M. Blanco Clemente, L. Robado de Lope, A. Romero, M. Uribarren Movilla, V. Calvo de Juan, M. Provencio Pulla, E. Perez García, A. Frisuelos, I.R. Canovas Del Castillo
article en

Abstract

Background: Accurate target volume delineation in radiotherapy in non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is based on integration of CT and [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG) PET.PET imaging with fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) enables visualization of FAP.This study evaluated [ 18 F]FDG-vs.[ 18 F]FAPI-74 PET/CT for target volume delineation.Methods: 40 patients with histologically confirmed advanced/recurrent lung cancer underwent both [ 18 F]FDG and [ 18 F]FAPI-74 PET/CT before radiotherapy.Tumor uptake was quantified using tumor-to-background ratios (tumor SUVmax / SUVmean of mediastinal blood pool).After excluding PET-negative cases, 33 datasets were analyzed.CT-based gross tumor volumes (GTV_CT) were compared with semiautomatically segmented PET-derived GTVs using absolute background-based thresholds (SUV 1.5-, 2.-, 2.5-, or 3-fold blood pool SUVmean).Thoracic metabolic tumor volumes (MTV_thoracic) and FAPI-avid tumor volume (FTV_thoracic) were assessed using relative, per-lesion thresholds, i.e., 42% isocontour of the local lesion SUVmax.Data are reported as median (1 st -3 rd quartile; Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm correction).Results: Median tumor-to-background ratio was higher for [ 18 F]FAPI-74 than for [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT (4 [2.6-5.1]vs 3.8 [2.6-7.4],p = 0.8).Median GTV_CT was 94.3 cm 3 (36.8-177.8).With a threshold of 1.5, median FDG-and FAPI-derived GTVs were 28 cm 3 (10.7-90.4) and 31.3 cm 3 (18-75).At thresholds of 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0, median FDG-derived GTVs were 22 cm 3 (4.3-61.5),11.3 cm 3 (1.5-43), and 6.7 cm 3 (0.2-37.4, vs. 15 cm 3 (5.6-48), 9 cm 3 (1.6-31), and 3.4 cm 3 (0.4-14) for FAPI, respectively.FDGand FAPI-derived GTVs did not differ at any threshold (Holm-adjusted p 0.05).All PET-derived GTVs were significantly smaller than GTV_CT (p < 0.001), including in patients who did not undergo prior systemic therapy.Median MTV_thoracic and FTV_thoracic were 19.2 cm 3 (10-45) and 18.8 cm 3 (11-33.7);p = 0.2.Conclusions: [ 18 F]-FAPI-74-PET/CT shows favorable tumor-to-background uptake in lung cancer.PET-derived semiautomatically delineated GTVs differ substantially from CT-based GTVs, irrespective of use of prior systemic therapy.

ESMO OpenVol. 11
Centro Nacional de Microbiologia (ES), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.