Orthobiologics in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: A narrative review

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most frequent injuries in sports medicine. Despite advancements in surgical techniques, suboptimal results in terms of delayed graft incorporation into bone tunnels and ligamentization, as well as inferior clinical outcomes, still present significant challenges in treating these injuries. Orthobiological modalities such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cells have emerged as a potential adjunct to ACL treatment, with a theoretical advantage in enhancing local biological processes and subsequent improvements in clinical outcomes. Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched for relevant literature. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the currently available evidence on the efficacy of orthobiologics, or the lack thereof, in ACL repair and reconstruction (ACLR), with emphasis on graft incorporation into bone tunnels, ligamentization, and overall clinical outcomes. These modalities exert their theoretical effect by delivering growth factors, anti-inflammatory cytokines, and regenerative cells to the target site, which enhance local biological processes. Although some research has shown positive effects of orthobiologics in ACLR, clinical outcomes remain inconsistent, without consensus on preparation methods and administration protocols. The lack of homogeneous, high-quality methodology in existing studies limits the possibility of drawing definitive conclusions on the efficacy of orthobiologics in ACLR. Although orthobiological modalities provide theoretical benefits in improving outcomes, until more robust evidence is available regarding their efficacy and optimal application methods, their routine use warrants caution and cannot yet be recommended. Future research should focus on improving and standardizing clinical and research protocols before drawing any definitive conclusions on this matter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/218640
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orthobiologics in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: A narrative review

Lika Dzidzishvili, Jérôme Valcarenghi, Cecilija Rotim, Bruno Lovreković et al.
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Orthobiologics in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: A narrative review

Lika Dzidzishvili, Jérôme Valcarenghi, Cecilija Rotim, Bruno Lovreković, Nikolai Ramadanov, Srećko Sabalić, Marko Ostojic, Roland Becker, Mikhail Salzmann, Enrico Ragni, Robert Prill, Pier Francesco Indelli
article en

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most frequent injuries in sports medicine. Despite advancements in surgical techniques, suboptimal results in terms of delayed graft incorporation into bone tunnels and ligamentization, as well as inferior clinical outcomes, still present significant challenges in treating these injuries. Orthobiological modalities such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cells have emerged as a potential adjunct to ACL treatment, with a theoretical advantage in enhancing local biological processes and subsequent improvements in clinical outcomes. Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched for relevant literature. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the currently available evidence on the efficacy of orthobiologics, or the lack thereof, in ACL repair and reconstruction (ACLR), with emphasis on graft incorporation into bone tunnels, ligamentization, and overall clinical outcomes. These modalities exert their theoretical effect by delivering growth factors, anti-inflammatory cytokines, and regenerative cells to the target site, which enhance local biological processes. Although some research has shown positive effects of orthobiologics in ACLR, clinical outcomes remain inconsistent, without consensus on preparation methods and administration protocols. The lack of homogeneous, high-quality methodology in existing studies limits the possibility of drawing definitive conclusions on the efficacy of orthobiologics in ACLR. Although orthobiological modalities provide theoretical benefits in improving outcomes, until more robust evidence is available regarding their efficacy and optimal application methods, their routine use warrants caution and cannot yet be recommended. Future research should focus on improving and standardizing clinical and research protocols before drawing any definitive conclusions on this matter.

Advances in Clinical and Experimental MedicineVol. 35(12)
University of Zagreb (HR), Paracelsus Medical University (AT), CHU Ambroise Paré (BE), Mercy University Hospital (IE), Klinička bolnica Merkur (HR), IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio (IT), Krankenhaus Brixen (IT), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE), Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (ES), Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel (DE), University of Osijek (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.