Symptom Outcomes After Septal Perforation Surgical Repair Versus <scp>3D</scp> ‐Printed Customized Prosthesis

ABSTRACT Objective Surgical repair and 3D‐printed customized septal prosthesis (3D‐PCSP) are options for septal perforation treatment. We performed a study to compare the clinical outcomes of surgery and 3D‐PCSP using the NOSE‐Perf Scale (NPfS). Methods A chart review was performed on patients undergoing surgical repair or 3D‐PCSP placement between January 2018 and July 2024. The change in NPfS was used as primary endpoint. Demographics, ASA score, perforation size, etiology, and follow‐up duration were reported. Results Thirty‐five patients, 23 for surgical repairs and 12 for 3D‐PCSP, were included in this review [median (IQR)]. In the surgical repair group, perforation length and height measured 12 (10–18) mm and 10 (8–15) mm, respectively. Baseline NPfS was 24 (16–32), and this decreased to 8 (6–13) following surgical repair ( p &lt; 0.001). Follow‐up time was 12 (5–21) months. In the 3D‐PCSP group, septal perforation length and height measured 25 (15–30) mm and 17 (15–20) mm, respectively. The baseline NPfS was 17 (3–24.5), and this decreased to 9.5 (7–13) following 3D‐PCSP placement ( p = 0.001). The follow‐up was 18.4 (16–23) months. NPfS reduction was greater for surgical repair ( p = 0.018). Conclusions Surgery and 3D‐PCSP offer meaningful symptom relief for NSP patients. Treatment decisions should be individualized through shared decision‐making that considers patient comorbidities, preferences, surgeon experience, and risk tolerance. In this cohort, surgical repair was associated with greater NPfS reduction compared with 3D‐PCSP placement. Level of Evidence 3.