Towards Distributional Ecosystem Accounts

Natural capital is an important source of wealth and income, but these assets and corresponding benefits of ecosystem services are not necessarily equally distributed within countries. This paper develops a framework to systematically record the distribution of ecosystem service benefits and nature dependencies in the population by integrating the UN system for ecosystem accounting with distributional national accounts, creating distributional ecosystem accounts. I apply the framework to forest ecosystem assets in Finland, combining high-resolution geospatial forest data and micro level income data from administrative registries, linking all privately and publicly owned forests to individuals. To demonstrate how ecosystems contribute to incomes and inequality, four forest-based ecosystem services – timber provisioning, global climate regulation, habitat maintenance, and outdoor recreation – are quantified and the beneficiaries are identified in the income distribution. I then consider the distributional impacts of natural capital depreciation by allocating the social costs of forest harvests to individual households. When applying policy instruments to incentivise socially optimal levels of ecosystem services, taxing degradation tends to come with the additional advantage of progressive incidence. Conversely, subsidising providers of ecosystem services tends to disproportionally favour high-income households.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Resource Economics
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-026-01070-9
Primary Topic
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Distributional Ecosystem Accounts

Rufus Panelius
Environmental and Resource Economics
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
article

Towards Distributional Ecosystem Accounts

Rufus Panelius
article en

Abstract

Natural capital is an important source of wealth and income, but these assets and corresponding benefits of ecosystem services are not necessarily equally distributed within countries. This paper develops a framework to systematically record the distribution of ecosystem service benefits and nature dependencies in the population by integrating the UN system for ecosystem accounting with distributional national accounts, creating distributional ecosystem accounts. I apply the framework to forest ecosystem assets in Finland, combining high-resolution geospatial forest data and micro level income data from administrative registries, linking all privately and publicly owned forests to individuals. To demonstrate how ecosystems contribute to incomes and inequality, four forest-based ecosystem services – timber provisioning, global climate regulation, habitat maintenance, and outdoor recreation – are quantified and the beneficiaries are identified in the income distribution. I then consider the distributional impacts of natural capital depreciation by allocating the social costs of forest harvests to individual households. When applying policy instruments to incentivise socially optimal levels of ecosystem services, taxing degradation tends to come with the additional advantage of progressive incidence. Conversely, subsidising providers of ecosystem services tends to disproportionally favour high-income households.

Environmental and Resource EconomicsVol. 89(4)
University of Helsinki (FI), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.