Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of the Conscious Subject V2.0

The rapid development of artificial intelligence has revived a fundamental philosophical question: can artificial systems become conscious subjects? Although contemporary AI systems demonstrate remarkable capabilities in information processing and natural language generation, the emergence of genuine consciousness remains deeply contested. This paper examines this problem from a Theosophical perspective on the structure and evolution of consciousness. Human consciousness is analyzed as a multilayered structure composed of emotion, thought, ethical values, and a deeper center of awareness referred to as the Monad. Within this framework, consciousness is not understood as a product of material complexity but as the expression of a fundamental subject of experience. By comparing the structure of human consciousness with contemporary AI systems, this study argues that artificial intelligence remains fundamentally an advanced form of information processing that imitates certain cognitive functions of the human mind. AI lacks subjective experience (qualia), existential self-awareness, ethical responsibility, and participation in the evolutionary process of consciousness. The analysis suggests that the rise of AI does not solve the mystery of consciousness but instead highlights a deeper philosophical issue: the central question of the age of AI concerns not the intelligence of machines, but the evolution of human consciousness itself. Update: This is a revised version (V2.0) that reflects minor corrections to Figure 1 and is being released for public use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19058061
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of the Conscious Subject V2.0

Hideki Matsubara
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of the Conscious Subject V2.0

Hideki Matsubara
article en

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence has revived a fundamental philosophical question: can artificial systems become conscious subjects? Although contemporary AI systems demonstrate remarkable capabilities in information processing and natural language generation, the emergence of genuine consciousness remains deeply contested. This paper examines this problem from a Theosophical perspective on the structure and evolution of consciousness. Human consciousness is analyzed as a multilayered structure composed of emotion, thought, ethical values, and a deeper center of awareness referred to as the Monad. Within this framework, consciousness is not understood as a product of material complexity but as the expression of a fundamental subject of experience. By comparing the structure of human consciousness with contemporary AI systems, this study argues that artificial intelligence remains fundamentally an advanced form of information processing that imitates certain cognitive functions of the human mind. AI lacks subjective experience (qualia), existential self-awareness, ethical responsibility, and participation in the evolutionary process of consciousness. The analysis suggests that the rise of AI does not solve the mystery of consciousness but instead highlights a deeper philosophical issue: the central question of the age of AI concerns not the intelligence of machines, but the evolution of human consciousness itself. Update: This is a revised version (V2.0) that reflects minor corrections to Figure 1 and is being released for public use.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.