Sensing Cognitive Responses Through a Non-Invasive Brain–Computer Interface

Cognitive stress, also known as mental workload, constitutes a central topic within the field of psychophysiology due to its role in modulating attention, autonomic regulation, and stress reactivity. Furthermore, it bears direct relevance to practical monitoring systems that employ non-invasive sensing techniques. This study investigates whether a multimodal, non-invasive measurement setup can detect systematic physiological differences between Resting periods and short episodes of cognitive load within the same individuals. Additionally, it explores the capacity of such a system to differentiate tasks characterized by varying cognitive demands. A sequential, within-subject protocol was employed, comprising five consecutive phases (rest 1, Stroop, rest 12, subtraction, rest 3), during which five modalities were recorded concurrently: EEG, heart rate (HR), galvanic skin response (GSR), facial surface temperature, and oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>). Beyond phase-wise inspection of time-series data, an exploratory assessment of similarity across participants was conducted using correlation coefficients. The maximum cross-participant correlations observed were 0.88 (HR), 0.90 (GSR), 0.83 (facial temperature), and 0.77 (SpO<sub>2</sub>); however, these correlations were used only as exploratory descriptors of inter-individual similarity and did not imply a significant phase effect. For inferential analysis, phase-wise epoch means were evaluated through one-factor repeated-measures ANOVA. The heart rate exhibited a robust main effect of phase (F(4, 32) = 10.5862, p_GG = 0.01044, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.5696), with higher HR observed during cognitive load epochs (e.g., 77.841 ± 11.777 bpm at rest 1 versus 83.926 ± 14.532 bpm during subtraction). The relatively large standard deviation reflects variability between subjects rather than variability within epochs. Regarding processed baseline-referenced GSR, the omnibus phase effect was not statistically significant under the conservative Greenhouse-Geisser correction; therefore, GSR was interpreted as exploratory in this dataset. Facial temperature and SpO<sub>2</sub> likewise did not show statistically significant omnibus phase effects under Greenhouse-Geisser correction (e.g., SpO<sub>2</sub>: p_GG = 0.1209). EEG-derived measures provide supplementary central evidence of task engagement; entropy variations within an approximate dynamic range of 0.2 to 0.8 were observed, and the α/θ ratios demonstrated nearly a twofold distinction between rest and cognitive load epochs across different leads.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061892
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensing Cognitive Responses Through a Non-Invasive Brain–Computer Interface

Dimiter Prodanov, H. R. Hristov, V. Koleva, Teodor A. Vakarelsky et al.
Sensors
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Sensing Cognitive Responses Through a Non-Invasive Brain–Computer Interface

Dimiter Prodanov, H. R. Hristov, V. Koleva, Teodor A. Vakarelsky, Irina A. Kancheva, Kalin Dimitrov, Mitko Shoshev, Zlatogor Minchev
article en

Abstract

Cognitive stress, also known as mental workload, constitutes a central topic within the field of psychophysiology due to its role in modulating attention, autonomic regulation, and stress reactivity. Furthermore, it bears direct relevance to practical monitoring systems that employ non-invasive sensing techniques. This study investigates whether a multimodal, non-invasive measurement setup can detect systematic physiological differences between Resting periods and short episodes of cognitive load within the same individuals. Additionally, it explores the capacity of such a system to differentiate tasks characterized by varying cognitive demands. A sequential, within-subject protocol was employed, comprising five consecutive phases (rest 1, Stroop, rest 12, subtraction, rest 3), during which five modalities were recorded concurrently: EEG, heart rate (HR), galvanic skin response (GSR), facial surface temperature, and oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>). Beyond phase-wise inspection of time-series data, an exploratory assessment of similarity across participants was conducted using correlation coefficients. The maximum cross-participant correlations observed were 0.88 (HR), 0.90 (GSR), 0.83 (facial temperature), and 0.77 (SpO<sub>2</sub>); however, these correlations were used only as exploratory descriptors of inter-individual similarity and did not imply a significant phase effect. For inferential analysis, phase-wise epoch means were evaluated through one-factor repeated-measures ANOVA. The heart rate exhibited a robust main effect of phase (F(4, 32) = 10.5862, p_GG = 0.01044, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.5696), with higher HR observed during cognitive load epochs (e.g., 77.841 ± 11.777 bpm at rest 1 versus 83.926 ± 14.532 bpm during subtraction). The relatively large standard deviation reflects variability between subjects rather than variability within epochs. Regarding processed baseline-referenced GSR, the omnibus phase effect was not statistically significant under the conservative Greenhouse-Geisser correction; therefore, GSR was interpreted as exploratory in this dataset. Facial temperature and SpO<sub>2</sub> likewise did not show statistically significant omnibus phase effects under Greenhouse-Geisser correction (e.g., SpO<sub>2</sub>: p_GG = 0.1209). EEG-derived measures provide supplementary central evidence of task engagement; entropy variations within an approximate dynamic range of 0.2 to 0.8 were observed, and the α/θ ratios demonstrated nearly a twofold distinction between rest and cognitive load epochs across different leads.

SensorsVol. 26(6)
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG), Technical University of Sofia (BG), University of Telecommunications and Post (BG), Hachinohe Kodai2 High School (JP), Plovdiv University (BG), Institute of Information and Communication Technologies (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.