Three key directions toward the development of a holistic crop modelling framework

Diversified farming practices—like intercropping, riparian buffers, organic amendments, and integrated pest management—are considered reliable strategies to enhance global food production while reducing negative environmental impacts of fertilizers, pesticides, and other practises associated with modern agriculture. In the 1960s, monocultures, agrochemicals, and high-yielding crop varieties revolutionized global food production. Since then, crop and farm simulation models have guided field, farm, and watershed management. Because most of these models were developed within a management paradigm centered on monocropping, it remains unclear whether they adequately represent fundamental processes and mechanisms underlying diversified farms. Our exploratory review of 12 models commonly used to predict crop yield shows that most models lack mechanisms indispensable for that purpose in diversified farms, like positive interactions among plants or between plants and other organisms (e.g., pollinators, fungi). Most models oversimplify weed invasions and focus on isolated fields without landscape contexts. We propose a strategy to improve modelling diversified farms, based on three complementary questions that such models should be able to address: 1) Under which conditions intercropping increases long-term yield and reduces weed pressure? 2) How can the spatial and temporal configuration of diversified agricultural practices be optimized to enhance pollination, weed and pest suppression, water retention, and nutrient uptake? 3) how can ecosystem-based solutions be redesigned and optimized to reduce phosphorus legacies? We discuss how integrating principles from agronomy, ecology, and evolutionary biology into crop models can address these questions, offering insights for soil, crop, and farm modelling and management in diversified farming systems. • Diversified agronomic management practices could help address key environmental issues. • Most crop models were developed under paradigms inconsistent with these management practices. • Models focusing on crop, ecology, evolution, and others can complement each other. • Three research questions explore ways to integrate them to better assess diversified practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Informatics
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103723
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three key directions toward the development of a holistic crop modelling framework

Adam R. Martin, Lamees Shah, Carlos Alberto Arnillas, George B. Arhonditsis
Ecological Informatics
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Three key directions toward the development of a holistic crop modelling framework

Adam R. Martin, Lamees Shah, Carlos Alberto Arnillas, George B. Arhonditsis
article en

Abstract

Diversified farming practices—like intercropping, riparian buffers, organic amendments, and integrated pest management—are considered reliable strategies to enhance global food production while reducing negative environmental impacts of fertilizers, pesticides, and other practises associated with modern agriculture. In the 1960s, monocultures, agrochemicals, and high-yielding crop varieties revolutionized global food production. Since then, crop and farm simulation models have guided field, farm, and watershed management. Because most of these models were developed within a management paradigm centered on monocropping, it remains unclear whether they adequately represent fundamental processes and mechanisms underlying diversified farms. Our exploratory review of 12 models commonly used to predict crop yield shows that most models lack mechanisms indispensable for that purpose in diversified farms, like positive interactions among plants or between plants and other organisms (e.g., pollinators, fungi). Most models oversimplify weed invasions and focus on isolated fields without landscape contexts. We propose a strategy to improve modelling diversified farms, based on three complementary questions that such models should be able to address: 1) Under which conditions intercropping increases long-term yield and reduces weed pressure? 2) How can the spatial and temporal configuration of diversified agricultural practices be optimized to enhance pollination, weed and pest suppression, water retention, and nutrient uptake? 3) how can ecosystem-based solutions be redesigned and optimized to reduce phosphorus legacies? We discuss how integrating principles from agronomy, ecology, and evolutionary biology into crop models can address these questions, offering insights for soil, crop, and farm modelling and management in diversified farming systems. • Diversified agronomic management practices could help address key environmental issues. • Most crop models were developed under paradigms inconsistent with these management practices. • Models focusing on crop, ecology, evolution, and others can complement each other. • Three research questions explore ways to integrate them to better assess diversified practices.

Ecological InformaticsVol. 95
University of Toronto (CA), Scarborough Health Network (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.