THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF COSMIC INFORMATION: a critical–propositional analysis of The Universal Theory of Information (TUI): An Emergent Framework for Space, Time, and Gravity, by M. V. Rondet, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of The Universal Theory of Information (TUI): An Emergent Framework for Space, Time, and Gravity, by M. V. Rondet, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines whether an informational ontology can be considered a sufficient first foundation for the universe, or whether information itself depends on prior modal conditions such as distinction, boundary, observability, composition, and transcendence. Grounded in the foundational, recent, and dialogical bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, the article argues that Rondet’s proposal contains significant points of convergence with TO, especially regarding the non-primacy of space-time, the relational constitution of reality, and the emergent interpretation of gravity. At the same time, it identifies decisive tensions: under modal discipline, information cannot be accepted as an absolute origin unless its own conditions of possibility are first demonstrated. The article advances a propositional reinterpretation in which information is understood not as the first ontological absolute, but as a transcendent product of atomic relations—equivalent to knowledge, memory, and atomic radiation. On this basis, TUI is repositioned not as a complete primary cosmogony, but as a valuable emergent regime theory capable of describing later stages of cosmic structuration. The study also articulates the discussion with the phenomenic elements of TO, the Inductor Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity, and recent TO works on testability, operational bridges, and Gödelian discipline. In this sense, the article contributes both to the philosophical clarification of informational cosmologies and to the broader project of establishing the Theory of Objectivity as a modal–ontological framework in dialogue with contemporary physics. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Universal Theory of Information; modal ontology; information ontology; emergent gravity; space-time emergence; cosmology; phenomenic elements; Inductor Effects; atomic radiation; transcendence; Gödelian discipline; operational bridges; philosophy of physics; foundations of cosmology

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19074818
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF COSMIC INFORMATION: a critical–propositional analysis of The Universal Theory of Information (TUI): An Emergent Framework for Space, Time, and Gravity, by M. V. Rondet, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF COSMIC INFORMATION: a critical–propositional analysis of The Universal Theory of Information (TUI): An Emergent Framework for Space, Time, and Gravity, by M. V. Rondet, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of The Universal Theory of Information (TUI): An Emergent Framework for Space, Time, and Gravity, by M. V. Rondet, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines whether an informational ontology can be considered a sufficient first foundation for the universe, or whether information itself depends on prior modal conditions such as distinction, boundary, observability, composition, and transcendence. Grounded in the foundational, recent, and dialogical bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, the article argues that Rondet’s proposal contains significant points of convergence with TO, especially regarding the non-primacy of space-time, the relational constitution of reality, and the emergent interpretation of gravity. At the same time, it identifies decisive tensions: under modal discipline, information cannot be accepted as an absolute origin unless its own conditions of possibility are first demonstrated. The article advances a propositional reinterpretation in which information is understood not as the first ontological absolute, but as a transcendent product of atomic relations—equivalent to knowledge, memory, and atomic radiation. On this basis, TUI is repositioned not as a complete primary cosmogony, but as a valuable emergent regime theory capable of describing later stages of cosmic structuration. The study also articulates the discussion with the phenomenic elements of TO, the Inductor Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity, and recent TO works on testability, operational bridges, and Gödelian discipline. In this sense, the article contributes both to the philosophical clarification of informational cosmologies and to the broader project of establishing the Theory of Objectivity as a modal–ontological framework in dialogue with contemporary physics. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Universal Theory of Information; modal ontology; information ontology; emergent gravity; space-time emergence; cosmology; phenomenic elements; Inductor Effects; atomic radiation; transcendence; Gödelian discipline; operational bridges; philosophy of physics; foundations of cosmology

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.