An alternative statistical approach for method validation under EU Regulation 2021/808

Commission Regulation 2021/808 sets performance criteria for methods for analysing pharmacologically active substances in food-producing animals. Due to the vast numbers of veterinary drugs and sample matrices, conventional re-validation of existing methods to this regulation is costly and disruptive to the delivery of routine analyses. This paper presents an alternative approach to method validation based on adding fortified samples to routine screening batches that is cost-effective and fits seamlessly within routine analytical workflows. The relationships between added concentration and each of three quantities: (1) mean measurement result, (2) the uncertainty of the mean result, and (3) the within laboratory reproducibility standard deviation are directly estimated by a maximum likelihood fit of a statistical model to measurement results. Hence, the model provides estimates of trueness, relative standard deviation and measurement uncertainty at concentrations of interest that are within the range of concentrations used in the model fit. The CCα (decision limit for confirmation) and CCβ (detection capability for screening) are calculated from estimates of measurement uncertainty. Because this approach uses data collected during routine analyses across a large number of analytical batches, rather than relying on specifically constructed validation studies, the resulting estimates of trueness and within-laboratory reproducibility better reflect real-world method performance. Estimates of performance do not rely on patterns of replication at specific concentrations or the availability of a particular number of results. Instead, the sufficiency of validation data is judged by the relative standard errors of estimates of within lab-reproducibility at concentrations of interest gained by a parametric bootstrap of the fitted statistical model. R script (a programming language used for statistical analysis) which demonstrates model fitting, performance parameter estimation and assessment of validation quality <i>via</i> a parametric bootstrap is provided here along with further scripts that demonstrate the method in two examples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Additives & Contaminants Part A
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2026.2636065
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An alternative statistical approach for method validation under EU Regulation 2021/808

Warwick Anderson, Katherine Weddell, Roy Macarthur, Gary Dowsett et al.
Food Additives & Contaminants Part A
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
article

An alternative statistical approach for method validation under EU Regulation 2021/808

Warwick Anderson, Katherine Weddell, Roy Macarthur, Gary Dowsett, Brodie Andrews
article en

Abstract

Commission Regulation 2021/808 sets performance criteria for methods for analysing pharmacologically active substances in food-producing animals. Due to the vast numbers of veterinary drugs and sample matrices, conventional re-validation of existing methods to this regulation is costly and disruptive to the delivery of routine analyses. This paper presents an alternative approach to method validation based on adding fortified samples to routine screening batches that is cost-effective and fits seamlessly within routine analytical workflows. The relationships between added concentration and each of three quantities: (1) mean measurement result, (2) the uncertainty of the mean result, and (3) the within laboratory reproducibility standard deviation are directly estimated by a maximum likelihood fit of a statistical model to measurement results. Hence, the model provides estimates of trueness, relative standard deviation and measurement uncertainty at concentrations of interest that are within the range of concentrations used in the model fit. The CCα (decision limit for confirmation) and CCβ (detection capability for screening) are calculated from estimates of measurement uncertainty. Because this approach uses data collected during routine analyses across a large number of analytical batches, rather than relying on specifically constructed validation studies, the resulting estimates of trueness and within-laboratory reproducibility better reflect real-world method performance. Estimates of performance do not rely on patterns of replication at specific concentrations or the availability of a particular number of results. Instead, the sufficiency of validation data is judged by the relative standard errors of estimates of within lab-reproducibility at concentrations of interest gained by a parametric bootstrap of the fitted statistical model. R script (a programming language used for statistical analysis) which demonstrates model fitting, performance parameter estimation and assessment of validation quality <i>via</i> a parametric bootstrap is provided here along with further scripts that demonstrate the method in two examples.

Food Additives & Contaminants Part A
Fera Science (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.