117P Safety and effectiveness of cisplatin plus etoposide in hemodialysis patients with lung cancer

Background: While immunotherapy has improved outcomes in NSCLC, its efficacy is limited in many patients, warranting exploration of combination strategies such as the telomerase-targeting UV1 vaccine to enhance immune response and overcome resistance to checkpoint inhibitors.Methods: This randomized, multicentre, open-label phase II trial evaluated efficacy and safety of standard of care (SoC) PD-1 inhibitor +/-UV1, and enrolled patients with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC, ECOG 0-2 and PD-L1 expression 50%, eligible for first-line PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy.Patients were randomized 1:1 to SoC (pembrolizumab or cemiplimab) alone or in combination with eight UV1 + GM-CSF vaccinations s.c.over 13 weeks.Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) stratified by histology and ECOG status; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), duration of response (DoR) and safety.Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable across arms (n=15 each; inclusion was stopped early due to slow recruitment): 67% male in both arms, median age 70 vs 74 years, 20 vs 13 % ECOG 2 and 67-73% non-squamous histology.At a median PFS follow-up of 24 months, UV1 + SoC demonstrated no significant benefit over SoC (8 mo vs 7 mo, HR=0.92; 95% CI: 0.42 -2.02).Median OS was not reached in the UV1 + SoC arm and 24 months (95% CI: 0.00 -49.43) in the SoC arm, HR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.21 -1.66).12-month OS rates were 73.3 % (UV1 + SoC) and 60% (SoC).TTR and ORR were 2 mo and 53.3 % (UV1+SoC) vs 3 mo and 46.7 % (SoC) (HR=0.96,95% CI: 0.35-2,67), and median DoR was 17 mo (UV1+SoC) vs 11 mo (SoC) (HR=0.79;95% CI: 0.25-2.46).AEs occurred in 90% of patients, with grade 3 in 53%; most frequent were rash, lung infection, and liver enzyme elevations.More AEs were reported in the UV1+SoC arm (n=66 vs 47).No grade 3 AEs were deemed related to UV1, including two deaths (stroke, pneumothorax).Conclusions: UV1 in combination with SoC was well tolerated but did not significantly improve PFS or DoR.Although OS was not significantly longer in UV1-treated patients, a numerical OS advantage was seen, warranting further investigation and longer follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106424
Primary Topic
Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

117P Safety and effectiveness of cisplatin plus etoposide in hemodialysis patients with lung cancer

Fujihiro Kure, Chiaki Imai, Noriyuki Hattori, T. Itoh et al.
ESMO Open
Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation
article

117P Safety and effectiveness of cisplatin plus etoposide in hemodialysis patients with lung cancer

Fujihiro Kure, Chiaki Imai, Noriyuki Hattori, T. Itoh, T. Suzuki, K. Takagi, S. Yagi, M.M. Saito, G. Saito, H. Ikeda
article en

Abstract

Background: While immunotherapy has improved outcomes in NSCLC, its efficacy is limited in many patients, warranting exploration of combination strategies such as the telomerase-targeting UV1 vaccine to enhance immune response and overcome resistance to checkpoint inhibitors.Methods: This randomized, multicentre, open-label phase II trial evaluated efficacy and safety of standard of care (SoC) PD-1 inhibitor +/-UV1, and enrolled patients with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC, ECOG 0-2 and PD-L1 expression 50%, eligible for first-line PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy.Patients were randomized 1:1 to SoC (pembrolizumab or cemiplimab) alone or in combination with eight UV1 + GM-CSF vaccinations s.c.over 13 weeks.Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) stratified by histology and ECOG status; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), duration of response (DoR) and safety.Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable across arms (n=15 each; inclusion was stopped early due to slow recruitment): 67% male in both arms, median age 70 vs 74 years, 20 vs 13 % ECOG 2 and 67-73% non-squamous histology.At a median PFS follow-up of 24 months, UV1 + SoC demonstrated no significant benefit over SoC (8 mo vs 7 mo, HR=0.92; 95% CI: 0.42 -2.02).Median OS was not reached in the UV1 + SoC arm and 24 months (95% CI: 0.00 -49.43) in the SoC arm, HR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.21 -1.66).12-month OS rates were 73.3 % (UV1 + SoC) and 60% (SoC).TTR and ORR were 2 mo and 53.3 % (UV1+SoC) vs 3 mo and 46.7 % (SoC) (HR=0.96,95% CI: 0.35-2,67), and median DoR was 17 mo (UV1+SoC) vs 11 mo (SoC) (HR=0.79;95% CI: 0.25-2.46).AEs occurred in 90% of patients, with grade 3 in 53%; most frequent were rash, lung infection, and liver enzyme elevations.More AEs were reported in the UV1+SoC arm (n=66 vs 47).No grade 3 AEs were deemed related to UV1, including two deaths (stroke, pneumothorax).Conclusions: UV1 in combination with SoC was well tolerated but did not significantly improve PFS or DoR.Although OS was not significantly longer in UV1-treated patients, a numerical OS advantage was seen, warranting further investigation and longer follow-up.

ESMO OpenVol. 11
Chiba University (JP), Chiba University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.