From stakeholder mapping to statistical modeling: an illustrative demonstration of end-to-end Net-Map methodology for health governance analysis

Coordinating primary cancer prevention in Europe requires alignment across the EU, national, and local actors. Yet governance relations are challenging to observe. We used a participatory network approach to make relationships visible and test which ties are associated with funding. This study serves as a methodological demonstration to illustrate the complete Net-Map research cycle from data collection to statistical analysis. Three Net-Map sessions (January-February 2024) with a national NGO expert panel elicited stakeholders and ties for authority, influence, and funding, followed by validation. Canvases were used to record the information, and they were digitized afterwards into edge and attribute files. We described network structure and estimated four nested exponential random graph models (ERGMs) for the directed funding network, progressively adding governance level (EU, national, local), formal authority, and informal influence as predictors of tie formation. Model diagnostics included goodness-of-fit assessment, structural extensions controlling for degree heterogeneity and clustering, and robustness checks across network subsets. The final network comprises 128 organizations and 836 funding ties (density 5.14%). Funding is predominantly cross-level (71.4%). EU actors show the strongest outward activity (EU-national density 17.8%; EU-local 16.1%), while national-local is lower (6.2%). In ERGMs, influence is the strongest correlate of funding (OR 168.54, p < 0.001), authority is positive but smaller (OR 5.76, p < 0.001), and same-level funding is less likely (OR 0.35, p < 0.001). Model comparisons favored the full specification. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics were adequate for the modeled dyadic statistics. Supplementary structural extensions controlling for degree heterogeneity and clustering attenuate the influence OR to 41.49, while the authority OR remains stable (5.76–6.46), confirming that both effects are robust to model specification. This illustrative analysis claims that participatory Net-Map workshops, combined with formal network analysis are helpful in diagnosing coordination patterns in decentralized health systems. The findings suggest that authority and influence serve complementary functions in governance, with implications that warrant further investigation with broader panels and longitudinal designs. The results primarily serve as an example of methodological application rather than providing generalizable insights about Romanian cancer prevention governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Public Health
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-026-01879-2
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From stakeholder mapping to statistical modeling: an illustrative demonstration of end-to-end Net-Map methodology for health governance analysis

Iulian Oană, Marius Geantă, Cosmina Cioroboiu, Marian-Gabriel Hâncean et al.
Archives of Public Health
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

From stakeholder mapping to statistical modeling: an illustrative demonstration of end-to-end Net-Map methodology for health governance analysis

Iulian Oană, Marius Geantă, Cosmina Cioroboiu, Marian-Gabriel Hâncean, Jürgen Lerner, Antonin Tron-Lozai, Bogdan-Adrian Vidrașcu, Bianca-Elena Mihăilă, José Luis Molina
article en

Abstract

Coordinating primary cancer prevention in Europe requires alignment across the EU, national, and local actors. Yet governance relations are challenging to observe. We used a participatory network approach to make relationships visible and test which ties are associated with funding. This study serves as a methodological demonstration to illustrate the complete Net-Map research cycle from data collection to statistical analysis. Three Net-Map sessions (January-February 2024) with a national NGO expert panel elicited stakeholders and ties for authority, influence, and funding, followed by validation. Canvases were used to record the information, and they were digitized afterwards into edge and attribute files. We described network structure and estimated four nested exponential random graph models (ERGMs) for the directed funding network, progressively adding governance level (EU, national, local), formal authority, and informal influence as predictors of tie formation. Model diagnostics included goodness-of-fit assessment, structural extensions controlling for degree heterogeneity and clustering, and robustness checks across network subsets. The final network comprises 128 organizations and 836 funding ties (density 5.14%). Funding is predominantly cross-level (71.4%). EU actors show the strongest outward activity (EU-national density 17.8%; EU-local 16.1%), while national-local is lower (6.2%). In ERGMs, influence is the strongest correlate of funding (OR 168.54, p < 0.001), authority is positive but smaller (OR 5.76, p < 0.001), and same-level funding is less likely (OR 0.35, p < 0.001). Model comparisons favored the full specification. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics were adequate for the modeled dyadic statistics. Supplementary structural extensions controlling for degree heterogeneity and clustering attenuate the influence OR to 41.49, while the authority OR remains stable (5.76–6.46), confirming that both effects are robust to model specification. This illustrative analysis claims that participatory Net-Map workshops, combined with formal network analysis are helpful in diagnosing coordination patterns in decentralized health systems. The findings suggest that authority and influence serve complementary functions in governance, with implications that warrant further investigation with broader panels and longitudinal designs. The results primarily serve as an example of methodological application rather than providing generalizable insights about Romanian cancer prevention governance.

Archives of Public Health
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Bucharest (RO), University of Konstanz (DE), Center of Technology and Engineering for Nuclear Projects (RO), Ministerul Cercetării și Inovării (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.