When does higher credit lower forest area? Amazon contexts change credit’s impacts

Economic activities have transformed over half of the Earth's surface and the large-scale conversion of rural forests to agropastoral production is ongoing. Raising access to credit may lead producers to expand at the expense of the forest or, instead, invest to raise yields, reducing forest loss per unit output. Looking across Brazil's enormous Amazon, we show that extremely different local contexts differ in terms of which effect of credit dominates. We distinguish those contexts using factors that affect cattle and crop production. For each of these two outputs, we find distinct credit impacts by context. Cattle credit raises deforestation where pasture expands over native forest on far frontiers. Crop credit raises deforestation where farms expand over pasture and forest remnants. Understanding impacts heterogeneity can help to reduce losses of rural forests, even while credit is supporting local economies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2516366123
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When does higher credit lower forest area? Amazon contexts change credit’s impacts

Alexander Pfaff, Paula Carvalho Pereda, Patricia G. C. Ruggiero
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

When does higher credit lower forest area? Amazon contexts change credit’s impacts

Alexander Pfaff, Paula Carvalho Pereda, Patricia G. C. Ruggiero
article en

Abstract

Economic activities have transformed over half of the Earth's surface and the large-scale conversion of rural forests to agropastoral production is ongoing. Raising access to credit may lead producers to expand at the expense of the forest or, instead, invest to raise yields, reducing forest loss per unit output. Looking across Brazil's enormous Amazon, we show that extremely different local contexts differ in terms of which effect of credit dominates. We distinguish those contexts using factors that affect cattle and crop production. For each of these two outputs, we find distinct credit impacts by context. Cattle credit raises deforestation where pasture expands over native forest on far frontiers. Crop credit raises deforestation where farms expand over pasture and forest remnants. Understanding impacts heterogeneity can help to reduce losses of rural forests, even while credit is supporting local economies.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(12)
Duke University (US), College of Accounting (SI), Instituto de Estudos Avançados da Universidade de São Paulo
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.