Curbing Opportunism With Transparency: Evidence From China's Mandatory Customer Disclosure Regulation

ABSTRACT This study examines the governance effect of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's 2021 regulation mandating the disclosure of specific customer names. Using a Difference‐in‐Differences approach, we find that the regulatory mandate significantly suppresses the scale of insider selling. Mechanism tests reveal two distinct channels: (1) the “Regulatory Screening” channel, where the inhibitory effect is more pronounced in firms that maintained anonymity than in those that complied; and (2) the “Information Asymmetry” channel, evidenced by a reduction in bid‐ask spreads. Further analysis shows that the policy is most effective in innovation‐driven sectors (e.g., high‐tech, R&D‐intensive firms) where supply chain information is highly sensitive, and in firms with severe agency problems. Conversely, the impact is attenuated in firms that already possess robust monitoring mechanisms, such as high institutional or controlling shareholder ownership. Our results highlight the role of mandatory supply chain disclosure as a robust governance mechanism in curbing opportunistic insider behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Economic Review
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.70015
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curbing Opportunism With Transparency: Evidence From China's Mandatory Customer Disclosure Regulation

Wenting Zhang
Pacific Economic Review
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Curbing Opportunism With Transparency: Evidence From China's Mandatory Customer Disclosure Regulation

Wenting Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the governance effect of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's 2021 regulation mandating the disclosure of specific customer names. Using a Difference‐in‐Differences approach, we find that the regulatory mandate significantly suppresses the scale of insider selling. Mechanism tests reveal two distinct channels: (1) the “Regulatory Screening” channel, where the inhibitory effect is more pronounced in firms that maintained anonymity than in those that complied; and (2) the “Information Asymmetry” channel, evidenced by a reduction in bid‐ask spreads. Further analysis shows that the policy is most effective in innovation‐driven sectors (e.g., high‐tech, R&D‐intensive firms) where supply chain information is highly sensitive, and in firms with severe agency problems. Conversely, the impact is attenuated in firms that already possess robust monitoring mechanisms, such as high institutional or controlling shareholder ownership. Our results highlight the role of mandatory supply chain disclosure as a robust governance mechanism in curbing opportunistic insider behaviour.

Pacific Economic Review
Guangdong University of Finance (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Curbing Opportunism With Transparency: Evidence From China's Mandatory Customer Disclosure Regulation — Wenting Zhang · Pacific Economic Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS