Open science in a time of crisis: A chronology of the COVID-19 scientific response

This study explores how Open Science practices shaped the early international response to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the rapid development of vaccines in 2020. Using a mixed-methods approach, it integrates bibliometric analysis from Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus with a qualitative timeline of World Health Organization (WHO) communications to contextualise key scientific milestones. Findings indicate a strong correlation between open-access publishing – over 80% of pandemic-related publications were freely accessible – and accelerated scientific progress. The study highlights the critical role of digital infrastructures in enabling rapid knowledge dissemination and identifies the reemergence of economic barriers during vaccine commercialisation. From a Library and Information Science (LIS) perspective, this article underscores the importance of information professionals and equitable access policies in crisis response. It concludes by advocating for resilient and sustainable Open Science frameworks that extend beyond emergency contexts to support global scientific equity and innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Science
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515261421152
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open science in a time of crisis: A chronology of the COVID-19 scientific response

Maricela López-Ornelas, Sara Mandiá-Rubal
Journal of Information Science
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

Open science in a time of crisis: A chronology of the COVID-19 scientific response

Maricela López-Ornelas, Sara Mandiá-Rubal
article en

Abstract

This study explores how Open Science practices shaped the early international response to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the rapid development of vaccines in 2020. Using a mixed-methods approach, it integrates bibliometric analysis from Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus with a qualitative timeline of World Health Organization (WHO) communications to contextualise key scientific milestones. Findings indicate a strong correlation between open-access publishing – over 80% of pandemic-related publications were freely accessible – and accelerated scientific progress. The study highlights the critical role of digital infrastructures in enabling rapid knowledge dissemination and identifies the reemergence of economic barriers during vaccine commercialisation. From a Library and Information Science (LIS) perspective, this article underscores the importance of information professionals and equitable access policies in crisis response. It concludes by advocating for resilient and sustainable Open Science frameworks that extend beyond emergency contexts to support global scientific equity and innovation.

Journal of Information Science
Universidade da Coruña (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (MX)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.