Machine learning models to measure the importance of Geopolitical Tensions on Trade

We contribute to the international trade literature by extending the analysis of geopolitical tensions into an out-of-sample predictive framework. We use the adaptive nature of the Random Forest to verify whether the rising importance of geopolitics provides a forecasting signal without imposing parametric constraints. We find that it does. Geopolitical distance emerges as a dominant predictor of trade flows, consistently outranking traditional policy variables such as tariffs and RTAs—a result we validate against regularized linear benchmarks. For policymakers, this suggests that forecasting models accounting only for physical distance and traditional cost factors may suffer from systematic bias. • Proposes a random forest model to study trade flows. • Interpret results using classical gravity models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2026.102473
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning models to measure the importance of Geopolitical Tensions on Trade

Paolo Giudici, Costanza Bosone
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
Economic and Technological Innovation
article

Machine learning models to measure the importance of Geopolitical Tensions on Trade

Paolo Giudici, Costanza Bosone
article en

Abstract

We contribute to the international trade literature by extending the analysis of geopolitical tensions into an out-of-sample predictive framework. We use the adaptive nature of the Random Forest to verify whether the rising importance of geopolitics provides a forecasting signal without imposing parametric constraints. We find that it does. Geopolitical distance emerges as a dominant predictor of trade flows, consistently outranking traditional policy variables such as tariffs and RTAs—a result we validate against regularized linear benchmarks. For policymakers, this suggests that forecasting models accounting only for physical distance and traditional cost factors may suffer from systematic bias. • Proposes a random forest model to study trade flows. • Interpret results using classical gravity models.

Socio-Economic Planning SciencesVol. 105
Duke University (US), University of Pavia (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Economic and Technological Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.