315P PREDIRAD-NSCLC: Predictors of radiation pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer

Background: Stage III NSCLC represents a heterogeneous disease.Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the corner stone.Accurate staging is essential; however, any substantial discordance between clinical and pathological staging may affect treatment allocation and outcome.This study uses real-world data from the Baden-Wrttemberg Cancer Registry (BWCR) to characterize staging accuracy in operated patients and outcomes of major curative-intent treatments in stage III NSCLC.Methods: We identified 10,700 adults with non-metastatic NSCLC diagnosed 2017-2024 who received treatment in curative intent.Two cohorts were analyzed: 1) Primary surgery with pathological stage III (pIII, n = 1010), 2) Definitive chemoradiotherapy (RCT) durvalumab (Durva) with clinical stage III (cIII, n = 604).Only treatments according to the German S3 guidelines were included.Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression. Results:Staging accuracy was evaluated in all patients with initial surgery (n=3981).Clinical-pathological staging discordance here was substantial, with agreement only in 42.0%.Upstaging was more common (31.8%) than down-staging (26.2%).In group I, adjuvant platinum therapy (n=537) improved OS versus surgery alone (n=473; HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.4-0.7).Cisplatin (n=340) and carboplatin (n=197) showed comparable OS (HR 1.0).Median time to progression was 452 days for both platinum groups versus 329 days for surgery alone (p = 0.034).In group II, Durva maintenance conferred the highest benefit (RCT+Durva vs. RCT; HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.4-0.7).Here cisplatin was more effective in non-squamous tumors, while in squamous tumors both platinums performed comparable.Median time to progression was longest for cisplatin-RCT + Durva (339 days), followed by cisplatin-RCT (283), carboplatin-RCT + Durva (280) and carboplatin-RCT (218).Conclusions: Real-world evidence from BWCR interestingly reveals considerable staging discrepancy in non-metastatic NSCLC.Adjuvant platinum therapy confers benefit to pIII-patients irrespective of platinum regimen, while in cIII-disease, Durva maintenance and histology-specific platinum selection significantly influence outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106625
Primary Topic
Effects of Radiation Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

315P PREDIRAD-NSCLC: Predictors of radiation pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer

B.B. Wassila
ESMO Open
Effects of Radiation Exposure
article

315P PREDIRAD-NSCLC: Predictors of radiation pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer

B.B. Wassila
article en

Abstract

Background: Stage III NSCLC represents a heterogeneous disease.Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the corner stone.Accurate staging is essential; however, any substantial discordance between clinical and pathological staging may affect treatment allocation and outcome.This study uses real-world data from the Baden-Wrttemberg Cancer Registry (BWCR) to characterize staging accuracy in operated patients and outcomes of major curative-intent treatments in stage III NSCLC.Methods: We identified 10,700 adults with non-metastatic NSCLC diagnosed 2017-2024 who received treatment in curative intent.Two cohorts were analyzed: 1) Primary surgery with pathological stage III (pIII, n = 1010), 2) Definitive chemoradiotherapy (RCT) durvalumab (Durva) with clinical stage III (cIII, n = 604).Only treatments according to the German S3 guidelines were included.Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression. Results:Staging accuracy was evaluated in all patients with initial surgery (n=3981).Clinical-pathological staging discordance here was substantial, with agreement only in 42.0%.Upstaging was more common (31.8%) than down-staging (26.2%).In group I, adjuvant platinum therapy (n=537) improved OS versus surgery alone (n=473; HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.4-0.7).Cisplatin (n=340) and carboplatin (n=197) showed comparable OS (HR 1.0).Median time to progression was 452 days for both platinum groups versus 329 days for surgery alone (p = 0.034).In group II, Durva maintenance conferred the highest benefit (RCT+Durva vs. RCT; HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.4-0.7).Here cisplatin was more effective in non-squamous tumors, while in squamous tumors both platinums performed comparable.Median time to progression was longest for cisplatin-RCT + Durva (339 days), followed by cisplatin-RCT (283), carboplatin-RCT + Durva (280) and carboplatin-RCT (218).Conclusions: Real-world evidence from BWCR interestingly reveals considerable staging discrepancy in non-metastatic NSCLC.Adjuvant platinum therapy confers benefit to pIII-patients irrespective of platinum regimen, while in cIII-disease, Durva maintenance and histology-specific platinum selection significantly influence outcomes.

ESMO OpenVol. 11
Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Effects of Radiation Exposure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

315P PREDIRAD-NSCLC: Predictors of radiation pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer — B.B. Wassila · ESMO Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS