Fraud detection: do psychological traits, auditor ethics and professional skepticism make any difference?

Purpose This study aims to examine factors related to human psychological traits that are rarely explored in the auditing literature, specifically the auditor’s personality traits (PTs) and emotional intelligence. The paper investigates the effects of PTs (openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism), auditor ethics and professional skepticism on fraud detection. The moderating role of emotional intelligence in these relationships is also examined. Design/methodology/approach The study is carried out based on 340 questionnaires collected from external auditors working in Lebanon. The Smart-PLS4 was used to analyze data and test the research’s hypotheses. Findings The results reveal that fraud detection is negatively affected by neuroticism and positively influenced by conscientiousness, extraversion, auditor ethics and professional skepticism. The outcomes also provide evidence that emotional intelligence moderates the relationships between fraud detection and each of agreeableness, conscientiousness, auditor ethics and professional skepticism. Originality/value To the best of the researcher’s knowledge, this paper is among the first in Lebanon and one of the few that investigate whether auditors’ PTs, ethics and professional skepticism affect fraud detection. Moreover, the present study is the first to examine the moderating impact of emotional intelligence on the relationships between the five addressed PTs and auditors’ ability to detect fraud.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-08-2025-0450
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fraud detection: do psychological traits, auditor ethics and professional skepticism make any difference?

Rasha Mohammad Nouraldeen
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Fraud detection: do psychological traits, auditor ethics and professional skepticism make any difference?

Rasha Mohammad Nouraldeen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine factors related to human psychological traits that are rarely explored in the auditing literature, specifically the auditor’s personality traits (PTs) and emotional intelligence. The paper investigates the effects of PTs (openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism), auditor ethics and professional skepticism on fraud detection. The moderating role of emotional intelligence in these relationships is also examined. Design/methodology/approach The study is carried out based on 340 questionnaires collected from external auditors working in Lebanon. The Smart-PLS4 was used to analyze data and test the research’s hypotheses. Findings The results reveal that fraud detection is negatively affected by neuroticism and positively influenced by conscientiousness, extraversion, auditor ethics and professional skepticism. The outcomes also provide evidence that emotional intelligence moderates the relationships between fraud detection and each of agreeableness, conscientiousness, auditor ethics and professional skepticism. Originality/value To the best of the researcher’s knowledge, this paper is among the first in Lebanon and one of the few that investigate whether auditors’ PTs, ethics and professional skepticism affect fraud detection. Moreover, the present study is the first to examine the moderating impact of emotional intelligence on the relationships between the five addressed PTs and auditors’ ability to detect fraud.

International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Beirut Arab University (LB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fraud detection: do psychological traits, auditor ethics and professional skepticism make any difference? — Rasha Mohammad Nouraldeen · International Journal of Ethics and Systems (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS