Evidential Pluralism, Causal Pluralism, and an Integrative Theory of Causation

Evidential Pluralism, a position emerging from the Russo-Williamson Thesis claims that establishing causation in the sciences requires both difference-making and mechanistic evidence. We develop its ontological foundations and formulate an integrative type-level theory of causation. We argue that causality involves two necessary conditions (manipulability and mechanism) that are jointly sufficient for a relation to be causal so that X causes Y if and only if [1] one can, at least in principle, manipulate (the probability of) events of type Y by producing events of type X in a context C and [2] there is a mechanism linking events of type X to events of type Y. We show that such a Manipulationist-Mechanistic theory is not only adequate to exemplary causal claims in biomedicine and economics but also immune to the counterexamples troubling monistic theories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-025-09746-4
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidential Pluralism, Causal Pluralism, and an Integrative Theory of Causation

Mariusz Maziarz
Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Evidential Pluralism, Causal Pluralism, and an Integrative Theory of Causation

Mariusz Maziarz
article en

Abstract

Evidential Pluralism, a position emerging from the Russo-Williamson Thesis claims that establishing causation in the sciences requires both difference-making and mechanistic evidence. We develop its ontological foundations and formulate an integrative type-level theory of causation. We argue that causality involves two necessary conditions (manipulability and mechanism) that are jointly sufficient for a relation to be causal so that X causes Y if and only if [1] one can, at least in principle, manipulate (the probability of) events of type Y by producing events of type X in a context C and [2] there is a mechanism linking events of type X to events of type Y. We show that such a Manipulationist-Mechanistic theory is not only adequate to exemplary causal claims in biomedicine and economics but also immune to the counterexamples troubling monistic theories.

Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evidential Pluralism, Causal Pluralism, and an Integrative Theory of Causation — Mariusz Maziarz · Journal for General Philosophy of Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS