Climate Policies and Sustainability Performance in Banks: The Role of the Board of Directors

This article examines how board characteristics and home-country climate policies shape banks’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) controversy performance, using a sample of 415 listed banks in the USA, the UK and the European Union over 2015–2024. Combining fractional logit, panel logistic regressions and system generalized method of moments estimations to address bounded response variables, rating transitions and endogeneity issues, we show that corporate social responsibility committees and gender-diverse boards significantly improve both environmental and social outcomes. Board retirement and meeting exert a positive influence only on environmental performance, while board independence exhibits heterogeneous effects across sustainability dimensions. More stringent climate policies are associated with higher environmental outcomes, fewer ESG controversies and a greater likelihood of upward ESG rating transitions, highlighting the central role of corporate governance in bank sustainability. Overall, these findings highlight the multidimensional role of corporate governance in strengthening banks’ sustainability performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Business Review
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509261428639
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Policies and Sustainability Performance in Banks: The Role of the Board of Directors

Belinda Laura Del Gaudio, Daniele Previtali, Serena Gallo
Global Business Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Climate Policies and Sustainability Performance in Banks: The Role of the Board of Directors

Belinda Laura Del Gaudio, Daniele Previtali, Serena Gallo
article en

Abstract

This article examines how board characteristics and home-country climate policies shape banks’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) controversy performance, using a sample of 415 listed banks in the USA, the UK and the European Union over 2015–2024. Combining fractional logit, panel logistic regressions and system generalized method of moments estimations to address bounded response variables, rating transitions and endogeneity issues, we show that corporate social responsibility committees and gender-diverse boards significantly improve both environmental and social outcomes. Board retirement and meeting exert a positive influence only on environmental performance, while board independence exhibits heterogeneous effects across sustainability dimensions. More stringent climate policies are associated with higher environmental outcomes, fewer ESG controversies and a greater likelihood of upward ESG rating transitions, highlighting the central role of corporate governance in bank sustainability. Overall, these findings highlight the multidimensional role of corporate governance in strengthening banks’ sustainability performance.

Global Business Review
Parthenope University of Naples (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate Policies and Sustainability Performance in Banks: The Role of the Board of Directors — Belinda Laura Del Gaudio, Daniele Previtali, et al. · Global Business Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS