The Gender Non-affirmation from Sexual Partners Scale: Psychometric Evaluation and Correlates of a Brief Stigma Scale in a Sample Transgender and Gender Diverse Community Health Center Patients

This study evaluated the psychometric performance and correlates of a 4-item GNSP scale among transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (TGD) adults. Data were collected in 2019-2020 via an electronic, self-reported cross-sectional survey of 2192 TGD adults accessing two U.S. LGBTQ+ community health centers. Participants reporting sex within the past 6 months (60.7%, n = 1463) were asked the 4-item GNSP scale. Analyses were internal consistency reliability (α), confirmatory factor analysis, and a multivariable logistic regression model of GNSP scale correlates (adjusted odds ratios [AOR], 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]). Mean age was 27 years (range = 18-71 years), 18.7% were people of color, and 33.6% nonbinary. 42.7% reported past 6-month GNSP. The GNSP scale showed good reliability (α = 0.78) loaded onto a single factor (eigenvalue = 2.45; variance explained = 48.7%). Higher odds of reporting GNSP included nonbinary identity (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.51, 1.70), more past 6-month sexual partners (AOR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.17-1.21), a cisgender woman sexual partner (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.42-1.61), a high school degree or less (AOR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.28-1.59), elevated alcohol use (AOR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.46-1.65), severe psychological distress (AOR = 1.80; 95% CI 1.68-1.92), penile sex with a condom (AOR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.59-1.90) or without a condom (AOR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.28-1.49), and current PrEP use (AOR = 1.42; 95% CI 1.25-1.61). Lower odds of reporting GNSP included older age vs. ages 18-24 (AORs range 0.65-0.75), transfeminine identity (AOR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.80-0.94), uninsured (AOR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.48-0.60), and in committed relationships (AOR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.33-0.40) or ethically non-monogamous relationships (AOR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.35-0.43). Gender non-affirmation from sexual partners was highly prevalent and may represent important intervention targets for sexual and mental health. The GNSP scale demonstrated good psychometric properties and is a promising tool for future TGD research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-026-05043-3
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Gender Non-affirmation from Sexual Partners Scale: Psychometric Evaluation and Correlates of a Brief Stigma Scale in a Sample Transgender and Gender Diverse Community Health Center Patients

Mari Tarantino, Amiyah Guerra, Alexander B. Harris, Asa Radix et al.
AIDS and Behavior
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

The Gender Non-affirmation from Sexual Partners Scale: Psychometric Evaluation and Correlates of a Brief Stigma Scale in a Sample Transgender and Gender Diverse Community Health Center Patients

Mari Tarantino, Amiyah Guerra, Alexander B. Harris, Asa Radix, Blanca C Esquivel, Sari L. Reisner, Kenneth H. Mayer
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric performance and correlates of a 4-item GNSP scale among transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (TGD) adults. Data were collected in 2019-2020 via an electronic, self-reported cross-sectional survey of 2192 TGD adults accessing two U.S. LGBTQ+ community health centers. Participants reporting sex within the past 6 months (60.7%, n = 1463) were asked the 4-item GNSP scale. Analyses were internal consistency reliability (α), confirmatory factor analysis, and a multivariable logistic regression model of GNSP scale correlates (adjusted odds ratios [AOR], 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]). Mean age was 27 years (range = 18-71 years), 18.7% were people of color, and 33.6% nonbinary. 42.7% reported past 6-month GNSP. The GNSP scale showed good reliability (α = 0.78) loaded onto a single factor (eigenvalue = 2.45; variance explained = 48.7%). Higher odds of reporting GNSP included nonbinary identity (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.51, 1.70), more past 6-month sexual partners (AOR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.17-1.21), a cisgender woman sexual partner (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.42-1.61), a high school degree or less (AOR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.28-1.59), elevated alcohol use (AOR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.46-1.65), severe psychological distress (AOR = 1.80; 95% CI 1.68-1.92), penile sex with a condom (AOR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.59-1.90) or without a condom (AOR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.28-1.49), and current PrEP use (AOR = 1.42; 95% CI 1.25-1.61). Lower odds of reporting GNSP included older age vs. ages 18-24 (AORs range 0.65-0.75), transfeminine identity (AOR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.80-0.94), uninsured (AOR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.48-0.60), and in committed relationships (AOR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.33-0.40) or ethically non-monogamous relationships (AOR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.35-0.43). Gender non-affirmation from sexual partners was highly prevalent and may represent important intervention targets for sexual and mental health. The GNSP scale demonstrated good psychometric properties and is a promising tool for future TGD research.

AIDS and Behavior
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Michigan (US), Community Health Center (US), Fenway Health (US), Columbia University (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.