Stabilizing the measurement of relationship instability: Identifying optimal number of response options and a single-item assessment

Participant reports of romantic relationship instability are of central interest in relationship science. However, this construct is inconsistently measured, with different response options and items presented. Across two studies, we assessed the psychometric properties of a 6-item scale of relationship instability based on a 2- or 5-response option (RO) format ( N Study 1 = 853; N Study 2 = 1,007). We also examined the psychometric properties of each item to identify a strong single-item measure of relationship instability. In both studies, mean differences in item scores, total scores, reliability, and response time based on response option set were present, and data from the 5-RO condition displayed greater variability. A single-item assessment with strong psychometric qualities and minimal reductions in convergent validity is recommended for future use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075261435232
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stabilizing the measurement of relationship instability: Identifying optimal number of response options and a single-item assessment

Matthew A. Ogan, J. Kale Monk
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Stabilizing the measurement of relationship instability: Identifying optimal number of response options and a single-item assessment

Matthew A. Ogan, J. Kale Monk
article en

Abstract

Participant reports of romantic relationship instability are of central interest in relationship science. However, this construct is inconsistently measured, with different response options and items presented. Across two studies, we assessed the psychometric properties of a 6-item scale of relationship instability based on a 2- or 5-response option (RO) format ( N Study 1 = 853; N Study 2 = 1,007). We also examined the psychometric properties of each item to identify a strong single-item measure of relationship instability. In both studies, mean differences in item scores, total scores, reliability, and response time based on response option set were present, and data from the 5-RO condition displayed greater variability. A single-item assessment with strong psychometric qualities and minimal reductions in convergent validity is recommended for future use.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.