Comparative assessment of GHG emissions from end-of-life scenarios for waste prestressed concrete railway sleeper in Korea

This study conducted a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of three end-of-life scenarios for prestressed concrete railway sleepers (PCRS): landfilling without recycling (S1), recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) recycling (S2), and CO₂ capturing material reprocessing (S3). The system boundary and functional unit were defined in accordance with EN 15,804, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were evaluated using the IPCC 2021 GWP (100-year) method. An avoided burden approach was applied to reflect the environmental benefits of material substitution and CO₂ capture. The results indicate that S2 and S3 achieved net carbon offsets of 44,416 kgCO₂eq and 95,371 kgCO₂eq, respectively, relative to the baseline scenario (S1). These environmental benefits were primarily attributed to the avoided emissions from virgin material substitution and direct CO₂ removal. The study highlights the importance of on-site separation technologies for maximizing resource recovery and provides a circular solution for decarbonizing infrastructure waste management systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-026-02526-2
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of GHG emissions from end-of-life scenarios for waste prestressed concrete railway sleeper in Korea

Jae-Young Lee, Cheul-Kyu Lee, Kayoung Shin, Sangwon Ko et al.
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
article

Comparative assessment of GHG emissions from end-of-life scenarios for waste prestressed concrete railway sleeper in Korea

Jae-Young Lee, Cheul-Kyu Lee, Kayoung Shin, Sangwon Ko, Hye-Jin Hong
article en

Abstract

This study conducted a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of three end-of-life scenarios for prestressed concrete railway sleepers (PCRS): landfilling without recycling (S1), recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) recycling (S2), and CO₂ capturing material reprocessing (S3). The system boundary and functional unit were defined in accordance with EN 15,804, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were evaluated using the IPCC 2021 GWP (100-year) method. An avoided burden approach was applied to reflect the environmental benefits of material substitution and CO₂ capture. The results indicate that S2 and S3 achieved net carbon offsets of 44,416 kgCO₂eq and 95,371 kgCO₂eq, respectively, relative to the baseline scenario (S1). These environmental benefits were primarily attributed to the avoided emissions from virgin material substitution and direct CO₂ removal. The study highlights the importance of on-site separation technologies for maximizing resource recovery and provides a circular solution for decarbonizing infrastructure waste management systems.

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Chungbuk National University (KR), Korea Railroad Research Institute (KR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.