Fractured Borders of the Cold War : China’s Responses to the Boycotts of the 1980 Moscow Olympics and the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics

This study analyzes the conflicts and internal fissures surrounding the Olympics during the Cold War, focusing on China’s strategic responses to the 1980 Moscow and 1984 Los Angeles Olympic boycotts. It highlights the fact that China, despite its membership in the socialist bloc, joined the U.S.-led boycott of the Moscow Olympics and subsequently refused to participate in the Soviet-led boycott of the LA Olympics. This paper argues that China’s strategy was not the result of a linear judgment or based on Cold War ideological bloc logic; rather, it was a product of strategic calculations that prioritized its relationship with the United States. Through this analysis, the study demonstrates that international conflicts during the Cold War were multi-layered and complex, manifesting intensely not only in political and diplomatic spheres but also in the “non-political” arena of sports. Ultimately, the strategies adopted by China regarding these two boycotts in the early 1980s suggest that the borders of the Cold War were collapsing from within. By doing so, this research contributes an intriguing new case study to the existing literature. This process, in turn, raises fundamental questions about the actual substantive meaning and role of ideology during the Cold War era.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Review of History
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38080/crh.2026.02.154.294
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fractured Borders of the Cold War : China’s Responses to the Boycotts of the 1980 Moscow Olympics and the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics

Sukjin Park
Critical Review of History
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Fractured Borders of the Cold War : China’s Responses to the Boycotts of the 1980 Moscow Olympics and the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics

Sukjin Park
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the conflicts and internal fissures surrounding the Olympics during the Cold War, focusing on China’s strategic responses to the 1980 Moscow and 1984 Los Angeles Olympic boycotts. It highlights the fact that China, despite its membership in the socialist bloc, joined the U.S.-led boycott of the Moscow Olympics and subsequently refused to participate in the Soviet-led boycott of the LA Olympics. This paper argues that China’s strategy was not the result of a linear judgment or based on Cold War ideological bloc logic; rather, it was a product of strategic calculations that prioritized its relationship with the United States. Through this analysis, the study demonstrates that international conflicts during the Cold War were multi-layered and complex, manifesting intensely not only in political and diplomatic spheres but also in the “non-political” arena of sports. Ultimately, the strategies adopted by China regarding these two boycotts in the early 1980s suggest that the borders of the Cold War were collapsing from within. By doing so, this research contributes an intriguing new case study to the existing literature. This process, in turn, raises fundamental questions about the actual substantive meaning and role of ideology during the Cold War era.

Critical Review of HistoryVol. 154
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.