Establishing the laboratory error database: rationale, methodology, and a practical example

Laboratory errors represent a critical yet underestimated threat to patient safety, with 26-30 % of reported errors adversely affecting patient care. Despite extensive scientific literature, no sustainable, open-access platform exists that allows laboratory professionals to rapidly access comprehensive information on error types, bias magnitudes, and clinical risks for specific analytes and platforms. To address this gap, the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) established the Committee on Laboratory Error Database (C-LED). C-LED aims to develop and maintain a continuously updated, evidence-based database covering laboratory errors, their impacts on test results, severity of potential harm, and supporting references across multiple analytical platforms and assay generations. C-LED employs a novel three-pillar information procurement strategy encompassing literature knowledge, manufacturer data, and supplementary sources, including incident reports and external quality assessment data. The literature procurement utilizes an innovative two-stage AI-driven approach: Stage 1 employs Claude Desktop with Model Context Protocol integration for systematic PubMed and Crossref screening, while Stage 2 combines Google NotebookLM and Claude Desktop for comprehensive full-text data extraction using standardized prompts and metadata structures. A case study examining haemolysis interference on cardiac troponin measurements demonstrates the approach's value, revealing platform-specific patterns ranging from minimal interference in contemporary high-sensitivity assays to severe bias in older platforms. The study identified that interference magnitude is concentration-dependent, with greater impacts at lower analyte baselines. By combining institutional governance, AI-driven efficiency, and multiple information sources, C-LED aim to establish a sustainable framework for database construction, ultimately enhancing diagnostic accuracy and patient safety globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0174
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing the laboratory error database: rationale, methodology, and a practical example

Nathan Lorde, Oswald Sonntag, Hikmet Can Çubukçu, Chiara Cosma et al.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Establishing the laboratory error database: rationale, methodology, and a practical example

Nathan Lorde, Oswald Sonntag, Hikmet Can Çubukçu, Chiara Cosma, Mario Plebani, Charles Lefèvre, Amitava Dasgupta, Giuseppe Lippi
article en

Abstract

Laboratory errors represent a critical yet underestimated threat to patient safety, with 26-30 % of reported errors adversely affecting patient care. Despite extensive scientific literature, no sustainable, open-access platform exists that allows laboratory professionals to rapidly access comprehensive information on error types, bias magnitudes, and clinical risks for specific analytes and platforms. To address this gap, the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) established the Committee on Laboratory Error Database (C-LED). C-LED aims to develop and maintain a continuously updated, evidence-based database covering laboratory errors, their impacts on test results, severity of potential harm, and supporting references across multiple analytical platforms and assay generations. C-LED employs a novel three-pillar information procurement strategy encompassing literature knowledge, manufacturer data, and supplementary sources, including incident reports and external quality assessment data. The literature procurement utilizes an innovative two-stage AI-driven approach: Stage 1 employs Claude Desktop with Model Context Protocol integration for systematic PubMed and Crossref screening, while Stage 2 combines Google NotebookLM and Claude Desktop for comprehensive full-text data extraction using standardized prompts and metadata structures. A case study examining haemolysis interference on cardiac troponin measurements demonstrates the approach's value, revealing platform-specific patterns ranging from minimal interference in contemporary high-sensitivity assays to severe bias in older platforms. The study identified that interference magnitude is concentration-dependent, with greater impacts at lower analyte baselines. By combining institutional governance, AI-driven efficiency, and multiple information sources, C-LED aim to establish a sustainable framework for database construction, ultimately enhancing diagnostic accuracy and patient safety globally.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
University of Verona (IT), Ministry of Health (TR), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Padua (IT), Université Rennes 2 (FR), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR), Oldham Council (GB), Université de Rennes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.