Evaluating longitudinal, reciprocal, and cross-sectional effects of (de)motivating teaching styles on students’ psychological and educational outcomes in physical education

Grounded in Self-Determination Theory and the circumplex model of teaching behaviors, this three-wave study (N = 637 secondary students) analyzed longitudinal, reciprocal, and cross-sectional relations among (de)motivating teaching styles, basic psychological needs (BPN), and student outcomes using a structural equation model. Perceived autonomy-supportive and structuring styles at Time 1 (T1) predicted higher BPN satisfaction at Time 2 (T2), which, in turn, related to more positive experiences and perceived learning in class and greater intention for physical activity beyond class at Time 3 (T3). Conversely, controlling and chaotic styles at T1 were linked to BPN frustration at T2 and poorer outcomes at T3. BPN satisfaction (frustration) at T2 also showed a longitudinal associations with higher (lower) perceptions of autonomy-supportive/structuring, and lower (higher) controlling/chaotic styles at T3. Findings highlight long-term, bidirectional dynamics with implications for teacher education. The findings indicate that teacher training programs should foster autonomy-supportive and structuring styles while reducing controlling and chaotic ones to promote adaptive motivational patterns and improve student outcomes. • Autonomy-supportive teaching at T1 predicted BPN satisfaction at T2, which enhanced PE experiences, learning, and PA intention at T3. • Controlling and chaotic teaching at T1 predicted BPN frustration at T2, which reduced PE experiences, learning, and PA intention at T3. • BPN satisfaction at T2 positively predicted later perceptions of autonomy-supportive and structuring styles. • BPN frustration at T2 predicted increased perceptions of controlling and chaotic teaching at T3. • Autonomy-supportive and structuring styles were cross-sectionally linked to positive PE outcomes, while controlling style was negatively linked to students’ PE experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies In Educational Evaluation
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101597
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating longitudinal, reciprocal, and cross-sectional effects of (de)motivating teaching styles on students’ psychological and educational outcomes in physical education

Lennia Matos, Luis García-González, Javier García-Cazorla, Ángel Abós et al.
Studies In Educational Evaluation
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Evaluating longitudinal, reciprocal, and cross-sectional effects of (de)motivating teaching styles on students’ psychological and educational outcomes in physical education

Lennia Matos, Luis García-González, Javier García-Cazorla, Ángel Abós, Rafael Gargurevich
article en

Abstract

Grounded in Self-Determination Theory and the circumplex model of teaching behaviors, this three-wave study (N = 637 secondary students) analyzed longitudinal, reciprocal, and cross-sectional relations among (de)motivating teaching styles, basic psychological needs (BPN), and student outcomes using a structural equation model. Perceived autonomy-supportive and structuring styles at Time 1 (T1) predicted higher BPN satisfaction at Time 2 (T2), which, in turn, related to more positive experiences and perceived learning in class and greater intention for physical activity beyond class at Time 3 (T3). Conversely, controlling and chaotic styles at T1 were linked to BPN frustration at T2 and poorer outcomes at T3. BPN satisfaction (frustration) at T2 also showed a longitudinal associations with higher (lower) perceptions of autonomy-supportive/structuring, and lower (higher) controlling/chaotic styles at T3. Findings highlight long-term, bidirectional dynamics with implications for teacher education. The findings indicate that teacher training programs should foster autonomy-supportive and structuring styles while reducing controlling and chaotic ones to promote adaptive motivational patterns and improve student outcomes. • Autonomy-supportive teaching at T1 predicted BPN satisfaction at T2, which enhanced PE experiences, learning, and PA intention at T3. • Controlling and chaotic teaching at T1 predicted BPN frustration at T2, which reduced PE experiences, learning, and PA intention at T3. • BPN satisfaction at T2 positively predicted later perceptions of autonomy-supportive and structuring styles. • BPN frustration at T2 predicted increased perceptions of controlling and chaotic teaching at T3. • Autonomy-supportive and structuring styles were cross-sectionally linked to positive PE outcomes, while controlling style was negatively linked to students’ PE experiences.

Studies In Educational EvaluationVol. 89
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.