Suspicion: The politics of knowledge production when fieldwork and writing are uneasy

Abstract How might fieldwork anxieties serve as a productive site to revisit the theoretical presumptions that guide research practices? This article explores moments of suspicion and scepticism during fieldwork to reflect on the tensions of fixing anthropological lines of inquiry and conceptual lineages. Drawing on research with Sahrawi refugees and the Sahrawi state‐in‐exile, it examines the disjuncture between project conceptualisation and fieldwork experiences to reflect on the conceptual troubles of pursuing research framed as novel. The article demonstrates how the tensions of conducting ‘novel’ research provides insight into the politics of knowledge production, providing the opportunity to critique and dismantle the homogeneity and force of concepts like sovereignty without undercutting the communities who have the most at stake in the pressures to conform to them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Journal of Anthropology
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.70061
Primary Topic
African Studies and Geopolitics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suspicion: The politics of knowledge production when fieldwork and writing are uneasy

Randi Irwin
The Australian Journal of Anthropology
African Studies and Geopolitics
article

Suspicion: The politics of knowledge production when fieldwork and writing are uneasy

Randi Irwin
article en

Abstract

Abstract How might fieldwork anxieties serve as a productive site to revisit the theoretical presumptions that guide research practices? This article explores moments of suspicion and scepticism during fieldwork to reflect on the tensions of fixing anthropological lines of inquiry and conceptual lineages. Drawing on research with Sahrawi refugees and the Sahrawi state‐in‐exile, it examines the disjuncture between project conceptualisation and fieldwork experiences to reflect on the conceptual troubles of pursuing research framed as novel. The article demonstrates how the tensions of conducting ‘novel’ research provides insight into the politics of knowledge production, providing the opportunity to critique and dismantle the homogeneity and force of concepts like sovereignty without undercutting the communities who have the most at stake in the pressures to conform to them.

The Australian Journal of Anthropology
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
African Studies and Geopolitics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.