Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles

Efficient and reliable charging strategies are essential for improving the performance, lifetime, and safety of modern battery energy storage systems, particularly under diverse operating conditions. This study presents a systematic analysis and comparative evaluation of three representative charging approaches: the Constant-Current (CC) method, the Pulse Charging method, and the Multistage Constant-Current (MSCC) method, each investigated at different C-rates. The mathematical principles and operational mechanisms of these methods are first introduced, followed by the development of a simulation model. Performance evaluation is conducted in terms of critical indicators, including temperature rise, charging time, and terminal voltage dynamics. The results indicate that the MSCC method achieves a more favorable balance between charging efficiency and thermal management compared to conventional techniques. Furthermore, the Taguchi optimization method is employed to determine the optimal charging parameters within the MSCC framework, thereby enhancing overall performance and safety. These findings underscore the potential of combining advanced charging strategies with systematic optimization techniques to improve battery management systems and support the development of next-generation energy storage technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Studies
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1830471
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles

Yunus Yalman, Furkan Görür
International Journal of Energy Studies
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles

Yunus Yalman, Furkan Görür
article en

Abstract

Efficient and reliable charging strategies are essential for improving the performance, lifetime, and safety of modern battery energy storage systems, particularly under diverse operating conditions. This study presents a systematic analysis and comparative evaluation of three representative charging approaches: the Constant-Current (CC) method, the Pulse Charging method, and the Multistage Constant-Current (MSCC) method, each investigated at different C-rates. The mathematical principles and operational mechanisms of these methods are first introduced, followed by the development of a simulation model. Performance evaluation is conducted in terms of critical indicators, including temperature rise, charging time, and terminal voltage dynamics. The results indicate that the MSCC method achieves a more favorable balance between charging efficiency and thermal management compared to conventional techniques. Furthermore, the Taguchi optimization method is employed to determine the optimal charging parameters within the MSCC framework, thereby enhancing overall performance and safety. These findings underscore the potential of combining advanced charging strategies with systematic optimization techniques to improve battery management systems and support the development of next-generation energy storage technologies.

International Journal of Energy StudiesVol. 11(1)
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.