Bandung and the Third World: Historical Reference Points for Interpreting China’s Global South Narrative

This study analyzes how China, across the periods of revolution, the Cold War, and détente, appropriated the idea of the “Third World” both ideologically and materially. Although the Chinese Revolution emerged within and was structurally constrained by the U.S.–Soviet bipolar confrontation, Mao Zedong and the Chinese Communist Party persistently questioned the given logic of a world divided into East and West, thereby carving out an autonomous conceptual space that they termed the “intermediate zone.”<br/>The 1955 Bandung Conference provided the material juncture at which the notions of the “intermediate zone” and the “Third World” first converged. The subsequent trajectory—from the “intermediate zone thesis”, through the “two intermediate zones”, to “Three Worlds Theory”— embodied a complex dynamic of encounter, divergence, and refracted return vis-à-vis the Bandung Spirit led by the Colombo group.<br/>Examining this internal complexity is essential because it offers a historical reference points for understanding China’s contemporary endeavor to reassemble the heirs of Bandung under the banner of the Global South.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Review of History
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38080/crh.2026.02.154.424
Primary Topic
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bandung and the Third World: Historical Reference Points for Interpreting China’s Global South Narrative

Jiwoon Baik
Critical Review of History
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
article

Bandung and the Third World: Historical Reference Points for Interpreting China’s Global South Narrative

Jiwoon Baik
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes how China, across the periods of revolution, the Cold War, and détente, appropriated the idea of the “Third World” both ideologically and materially. Although the Chinese Revolution emerged within and was structurally constrained by the U.S.–Soviet bipolar confrontation, Mao Zedong and the Chinese Communist Party persistently questioned the given logic of a world divided into East and West, thereby carving out an autonomous conceptual space that they termed the “intermediate zone.”<br/>The 1955 Bandung Conference provided the material juncture at which the notions of the “intermediate zone” and the “Third World” first converged. The subsequent trajectory—from the “intermediate zone thesis”, through the “two intermediate zones”, to “Three Worlds Theory”— embodied a complex dynamic of encounter, divergence, and refracted return vis-à-vis the Bandung Spirit led by the Colombo group.<br/>Examining this internal complexity is essential because it offers a historical reference points for understanding China’s contemporary endeavor to reassemble the heirs of Bandung under the banner of the Global South.

Critical Review of HistoryVol. 154
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.