Argumentative Debates for Transparent Bias Detection

As the use of AI in society grows, addressing emerging biases is essential to prevent systematic discrimination. Several bias detection methods have been proposed, but, with few exceptions, these tend to ignore transparency. Instead, interpretability and explainability are core requirements for algorithmic fairness, even more so than for other algorithmic solutions, given the human-oriented nature of fairness. We present ABIDE (Argumentative BIas detection by DEbate), a novel framework that structures bias detection transparently as debate, guided by an underlying argument graph as understood in (formal and computational) argumentation. The arguments are about the success chances of groups in local neighbourhoods and the significance of these neighbourhoods. We evaluate ABIDE experimentally and demonstrate its strengths in performance against an argumentative baseline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v40i23.38965
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Argumentative Debates for Transparent Bias Detection

Hamed Ayoobi, Anna Rapberger, Nico Potyka, Francesca Toni
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Argumentative Debates for Transparent Bias Detection

Hamed Ayoobi, Anna Rapberger, Nico Potyka, Francesca Toni
article en

Abstract

As the use of AI in society grows, addressing emerging biases is essential to prevent systematic discrimination. Several bias detection methods have been proposed, but, with few exceptions, these tend to ignore transparency. Instead, interpretability and explainability are core requirements for algorithmic fairness, even more so than for other algorithmic solutions, given the human-oriented nature of fairness. We present ABIDE (Argumentative BIas detection by DEbate), a novel framework that structures bias detection transparently as debate, guided by an underlying argument graph as understood in (formal and computational) argumentation. The arguments are about the success chances of groups in local neighbourhoods and the significance of these neighbourhoods. We evaluate ABIDE experimentally and demonstrate its strengths in performance against an argumentative baseline.

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 40(23)
University of Groningen (NL), TU Dortmund University (DE), Imperial College London (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.