Grant Distribution in Private Foundations: How Professionalization, Size, and Foundation Type Relate to Concentration and Persistence

ABSTRACT This study examines how private foundations distribute grants and which organizational characteristics are associated with these patterns. While much of the existing literature focuses on grantee traits, this research shifts the focus to foundations themselves, analyzing how their internal features relate to grant distribution strategies. It introduces two key indicators of grantee accessibility: concentration of funding across recipients and persistence in funding the same grantees over time. Using IRS Form 990‐PF e‐file data from 2012 to 2016 for 18,310 grantmaking foundations annually, the analysis employs hybrid models to distinguish within‐foundation change from between‐foundation differences in grant distribution. The findings reveal systematic variation in concentration and persistence across foundations and over time. Professionalization is associated with different distribution patterns depending on the dimension examined, indicating that professionalized foundations adopt focused, diversified, or mixed grantmaking strategies. Larger foundations distribute funding across a broader range of recipients with varying degrees of continuity. Corporate foundations exhibit lower concentration and persistence relative to independent foundations. This study introduces an empirical framework for analyzing how foundations allocate resources across nonprofit recipients, contributing to research on philanthropic behavior and offering new insights into the strategic dynamics and societal implications of grant distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70047
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grant Distribution in Private Foundations: How Professionalization, Size, and Foundation Type Relate to Concentration and Persistence

Jihye Jung
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Grant Distribution in Private Foundations: How Professionalization, Size, and Foundation Type Relate to Concentration and Persistence

Jihye Jung
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how private foundations distribute grants and which organizational characteristics are associated with these patterns. While much of the existing literature focuses on grantee traits, this research shifts the focus to foundations themselves, analyzing how their internal features relate to grant distribution strategies. It introduces two key indicators of grantee accessibility: concentration of funding across recipients and persistence in funding the same grantees over time. Using IRS Form 990‐PF e‐file data from 2012 to 2016 for 18,310 grantmaking foundations annually, the analysis employs hybrid models to distinguish within‐foundation change from between‐foundation differences in grant distribution. The findings reveal systematic variation in concentration and persistence across foundations and over time. Professionalization is associated with different distribution patterns depending on the dimension examined, indicating that professionalized foundations adopt focused, diversified, or mixed grantmaking strategies. Larger foundations distribute funding across a broader range of recipients with varying degrees of continuity. Corporate foundations exhibit lower concentration and persistence relative to independent foundations. This study introduces an empirical framework for analyzing how foundations allocate resources across nonprofit recipients, contributing to research on philanthropic behavior and offering new insights into the strategic dynamics and societal implications of grant distribution.

Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Hainan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.