Requirement Analysis and Use Case Engineering via ethnographic methods – Negotiating FAIRness for Sensitive Interview Transcript Data

The primary motivation of this research is to bridge the gap between qualitatively working researchers’ limited readiness to share data and their expressed support for open‑data practices. The investigation is guided by two questions: (1) Why is there a gap between readiness and implementation of FAIR research data? (2) How can software, infrastructures, and existing practices be harmonized in support of FAIR research data in these disciplines? A qualitative, user‑centered approach was required to uncover existing practices that can be leveraged collaboratively while addressing researchers’ concerns. The methodology combines ethnographic techniques—including multi‑sited ethnography, immersive fieldwork based on contextual inquiry, and qualitative expert interviews—with grounded‑theory analysis. User requirements were abstracted from categorized field notes, observation protocols, and interview transcripts. Grounded‑theory analysis enables iterative refinement of these requirements, producing feasible use cases for subsequent implementation. The rich ethnographic data also reveal existing practices that can inform the development of software‑supported processes adaptable to diverse technological and architectural contexts. In this regard, encryption and de‑identification emerge as two promising use cases for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19062046
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Requirement Analysis and Use Case Engineering via ethnographic methods – Negotiating FAIRness for Sensitive Interview Transcript Data

Sabina Mollenhauer
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Research Data Management Practices
article

Requirement Analysis and Use Case Engineering via ethnographic methods – Negotiating FAIRness for Sensitive Interview Transcript Data

Sabina Mollenhauer
article en

Abstract

The primary motivation of this research is to bridge the gap between qualitatively working researchers’ limited readiness to share data and their expressed support for open‑data practices. The investigation is guided by two questions: (1) Why is there a gap between readiness and implementation of FAIR research data? (2) How can software, infrastructures, and existing practices be harmonized in support of FAIR research data in these disciplines? A qualitative, user‑centered approach was required to uncover existing practices that can be leveraged collaboratively while addressing researchers’ concerns. The methodology combines ethnographic techniques—including multi‑sited ethnography, immersive fieldwork based on contextual inquiry, and qualitative expert interviews—with grounded‑theory analysis. User requirements were abstracted from categorized field notes, observation protocols, and interview transcripts. Grounded‑theory analysis enables iterative refinement of these requirements, producing feasible use cases for subsequent implementation. The rich ethnographic data also reveal existing practices that can inform the development of software‑supported processes adaptable to diverse technological and architectural contexts. In this regard, encryption and de‑identification emerge as two promising use cases for future research.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Vechta (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.