Graph-Augmented Fault Diagnosis in Power Systems with Imbalanced Text Data: A Knowledge Extraction and Agent-Based Reasoning Framework
Fault diagnosis in modern power systems increasingly depends on unstructured operation and maintenance (O&M) logs, yet real-world logs are often small in scale and highly imbalanced across fault types, which degrades the generalizability of standard neural models. This paper proposes a graph-augmented diagnostic framework that integrates imbalance-aware knowledge extraction with interpretable reasoning. The framework consists of three stages: (1) domain adaptation of a BERT–BiLSTM–CRF NER model and a BERT–MLP RE model using an imbalance-aware training recipe that combines Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), a mixed focal–range loss, and undersampling; (2) construction of a power-system knowledge graph that organizes extracted entities and relations (e.g., fault devices, abnormal phenomena, causes, and handling measures); and (3) a graph-augmented assistant agent that reuses the NER model as a graph-aware retriever within a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) architecture to support contextualized and interpretable diagnostic reasoning. Experiments on 3921 real-world fault-processing logs show consistent gains: NER reaches 92.0% accuracy and 71.3% Macro-F1 (vs. 80.3% and 63.2%), and RE achieves 88.0% accuracy and 70.1% F1 (vs. 82.1% and 60.4%), while reducing average training time per epoch by about 18%. These results demonstrate an efficient and practical path toward robust log-based fault diagnosis under scarce and imbalanced data.
Authors
- Xiaogang Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0294-629X)
- Xiaotao Fang
- Qingbiao Lin
- Yipu Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1167-3046)
- S.S. Qiu
- Zhantao Fan
- Yan Guo
Institutions
- China Southern Power Grid (China) (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Technologies
- Published
- 2026-03-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14030181
- Primary Topic
- Software System Performance and Reliability
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00