A Preliminary Assessment of Noise‐Related Impacts From the Urban‐Invasive Johnstone's Whistling Frog ( <i>Eleutherodactylus johnstonei</i> )

ABSTRACT Invasive species can impact human populations beyond ecological effects, particularly in urban environments. The Johnstone's whistling frog ( Eleutherodactylus johnstonei ), native to the Lesser Antilles, has established in urban gardens in the Caribbean and northern South America. Its loud and persistent nocturnal calls are a source of noise pollution that may affect human health and well‐being. In this study, we conducted a preliminary assessment of noise‐related impacts in Cali, Colombia, a major urban center where whistling frogs are present. Our methods included (1) night‐time vehicle surveys to estimate property occupancy rates along city streets, (2) sampling in urban gardens to estimate their density, and (3) an online survey ( n = 330) to gauge residents' perceptions of the whistling frog's calls and potential health effects. Results indicate that whistling frogs in Cali occupy approximately 25% of surveyed properties, with over 50% probability of occupancy in areas larger than 0.1 ha. Densities varied with garden vegetation, ranging from 8 to 29 individuals per 10 m², exceeding those reported from natural sites within the species' native range. Survey responses revealed divergent perceptions and health outcomes associated with whistling frog calls: 42% of respondents, mostly younger adults (18–34 years), reported positive perceptions linked to nature connection and relaxation. Conversely, 19% reported annoyance driven by irritability, stress, and difficulty sleeping, suggesting a dual burden on mental health and sleep disturbance. Older adults (&gt; 55 years) and those with pre‐existing sleep disorders showed greater vulnerability. The remaining 39% expressed neutral perceptions, although some individuals in this group also reported negative impacts. Overall, our findings provide one of the first empirical assessments revealing potentially widespread but overlooked public health impacts caused by the noise of an invasive species, warranting further public health investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrative Conservation
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/inc3.70069
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Preliminary Assessment of Noise‐Related Impacts From the Urban‐Invasive Johnstone's Whistling Frog ( Eleutherodactylus johnstonei )

Rubén Darío Palacio, Sumana Goli
Integrative Conservation
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

A Preliminary Assessment of Noise‐Related Impacts From the Urban‐Invasive Johnstone's Whistling Frog ( Eleutherodactylus johnstonei )

Rubén Darío Palacio, Sumana Goli
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Invasive species can impact human populations beyond ecological effects, particularly in urban environments. The Johnstone's whistling frog ( Eleutherodactylus johnstonei ), native to the Lesser Antilles, has established in urban gardens in the Caribbean and northern South America. Its loud and persistent nocturnal calls are a source of noise pollution that may affect human health and well‐being. In this study, we conducted a preliminary assessment of noise‐related impacts in Cali, Colombia, a major urban center where whistling frogs are present. Our methods included (1) night‐time vehicle surveys to estimate property occupancy rates along city streets, (2) sampling in urban gardens to estimate their density, and (3) an online survey ( n = 330) to gauge residents' perceptions of the whistling frog's calls and potential health effects. Results indicate that whistling frogs in Cali occupy approximately 25% of surveyed properties, with over 50% probability of occupancy in areas larger than 0.1 ha. Densities varied with garden vegetation, ranging from 8 to 29 individuals per 10 m², exceeding those reported from natural sites within the species' native range. Survey responses revealed divergent perceptions and health outcomes associated with whistling frog calls: 42% of respondents, mostly younger adults (18–34 years), reported positive perceptions linked to nature connection and relaxation. Conversely, 19% reported annoyance driven by irritability, stress, and difficulty sleeping, suggesting a dual burden on mental health and sleep disturbance. Older adults (&gt; 55 years) and those with pre‐existing sleep disorders showed greater vulnerability. The remaining 39% expressed neutral perceptions, although some individuals in this group also reported negative impacts. Overall, our findings provide one of the first empirical assessments revealing potentially widespread but overlooked public health impacts caused by the noise of an invasive species, warranting further public health investigation.

Integrative Conservation
ProPacífico (CO)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.