The role of NPY in liver transplantation from extended-criteria donors

Donor shortage has increased liver transplantation (LT) waiting lists. The use of livers grafts from extended criteria donors (ECD), including deceased donors with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) or severe steatosis, particularly after prolonged cold ischemia (CI), is associated with a risk of graft dysfunction and reduced post-liver transplantation outcomes. This study investigated whether hepatic NPY depletion in donors after brain death (DBD) and donors after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) contributes to liver injury and regenerative failure. Rat models of donors after brain death (DBDs) or cardiocirculatory death (DCDs) with ALD or severe steatosis were used to assess how hepatic sympathetic nervous system (SNS) modulation, adrenal medulla (AM) removal, NPY (alone or with norepinephrine, NE), and AMPK-NO signalling affect liver damage and regeneration before retrieval from donors and after 24 h CI followed by ex vivo reperfusion or transplantation. In DBDs, SNS-derived hepatic NPY decreased, while NE was preserved thanks to AM. In DCDs, both NPY and NE (derived from SNS) were depleted. NPY administration (but not SNS stimulation) restored hepatic NPY and protected DBD grafts against damage and regenerative failure. In DCDs, only combined NPY+NE or SNS stimulation restored both NPY and NE, reducing damage but not improving regeneration. Protection in both donor types depended on AMPK-NO signalling, which was reduced before retrieval and restored by NPY (DBDs), NPY+NE or SNS stimulation (DCDs). Protection depended on AMPK-NO signaling and persisted after CI and reperfusion, improving survival. In contrast, AMPK activator, AICAR-which increased NO- and NO supplementation caused excessive NO after CI and reperfusion, increasing peroxynitrite generation, oxidative stress, liver damage and regenerative failure. The donor-type-specific drugs/interventions (NPY in DCDs; NPY+NE or ES stimulation in DCDs) might improve clinical LT outcomes from extended-criteria donors, whereas AICAR or NO supplementation is detrimental.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2026.03.045
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of NPY in liver transplantation from extended-criteria donors

Cristina Maroto-Serrat, Araní Casillas-Ramírez, Carmen Peralta, Francisco Sanus et al.
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

The role of NPY in liver transplantation from extended-criteria donors

Cristina Maroto-Serrat, Araní Casillas-Ramírez, Carmen Peralta, Francisco Sanus, Shuozhou Liang, Albert Caballeria, Jordi Gracia-Sancho
article en

Abstract

Donor shortage has increased liver transplantation (LT) waiting lists. The use of livers grafts from extended criteria donors (ECD), including deceased donors with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) or severe steatosis, particularly after prolonged cold ischemia (CI), is associated with a risk of graft dysfunction and reduced post-liver transplantation outcomes. This study investigated whether hepatic NPY depletion in donors after brain death (DBD) and donors after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) contributes to liver injury and regenerative failure. Rat models of donors after brain death (DBDs) or cardiocirculatory death (DCDs) with ALD or severe steatosis were used to assess how hepatic sympathetic nervous system (SNS) modulation, adrenal medulla (AM) removal, NPY (alone or with norepinephrine, NE), and AMPK-NO signalling affect liver damage and regeneration before retrieval from donors and after 24 h CI followed by ex vivo reperfusion or transplantation. In DBDs, SNS-derived hepatic NPY decreased, while NE was preserved thanks to AM. In DCDs, both NPY and NE (derived from SNS) were depleted. NPY administration (but not SNS stimulation) restored hepatic NPY and protected DBD grafts against damage and regenerative failure. In DCDs, only combined NPY+NE or SNS stimulation restored both NPY and NE, reducing damage but not improving regeneration. Protection in both donor types depended on AMPK-NO signalling, which was reduced before retrieval and restored by NPY (DBDs), NPY+NE or SNS stimulation (DCDs). Protection depended on AMPK-NO signaling and persisted after CI and reperfusion, improving survival. In contrast, AMPK activator, AICAR-which increased NO- and NO supplementation caused excessive NO after CI and reperfusion, increasing peroxynitrite generation, oxidative stress, liver damage and regenerative failure. The donor-type-specific drugs/interventions (NPY in DCDs; NPY+NE or ES stimulation in DCDs) might improve clinical LT outcomes from extended-criteria donors, whereas AICAR or NO supplementation is detrimental.

Free Radical Biology and MedicineVol. 249
Mexican Social Security Institute (MX), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.