Exploring sex-based differences in strength and wheelchair activities to assess fair competition of female wheelchair rugby players

Wheelchair rugby (WR) is a mixed-sex sport, with a point-based classification system ranking players on arm-trunk impairment. Players are classified as low-point (LP, 0.5-1.5) or high-point (HP, 2.0-3.5). Teams are allowed four players on court with a total score ≤8.0; 0.5 point is added to this score per female on court. This study explored sex-based differences in strength and wheelchair activities in WR players. Twenty-four female and fifty-eight male international WR players completed six isometric strength tests and 3×10m sprints on-court. One-way ANOVAs compared performance differences between groups (LP, HP, Females, Males, No-trunk (NT), Trunk (TR)). Female-LP-players had significantly lower scores than Male-LP-players on elbow flexion (-47%), push (-46%) and pull (-37%) strength. Female-HP-NT-players had significantly lower scores than Male-HP-NT-players on elbow flexion (-64%), shoulder flexion (-56%), shoulder extension (-52%), push (-61%) and pull (-56%) strength. Female-HP-TR-players had significantly lower scores than Male-HP-TR-players on elbow flexion (-54%), shoulder flexion (-66%) and push (-66%) strength. No differences were found between sexes in 10m sprints, but sprint momentum showed clear differences. Female WR players had less strength compared to males, with more pronounced differences in HP-players. This strength disparity has direct implications on current international regulations, supporting compensation through competition rules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2642449
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring sex-based differences in strength and wheelchair activities to assess fair competition of female wheelchair rugby players

Thomas Rietveld, Viola C. Altmann, Michael J. Hutchinson, Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal of Sports Sciences
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Exploring sex-based differences in strength and wheelchair activities to assess fair competition of female wheelchair rugby players

Thomas Rietveld, Viola C. Altmann, Michael J. Hutchinson, Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey
article en

Abstract

Wheelchair rugby (WR) is a mixed-sex sport, with a point-based classification system ranking players on arm-trunk impairment. Players are classified as low-point (LP, 0.5-1.5) or high-point (HP, 2.0-3.5). Teams are allowed four players on court with a total score ≤8.0; 0.5 point is added to this score per female on court. This study explored sex-based differences in strength and wheelchair activities in WR players. Twenty-four female and fifty-eight male international WR players completed six isometric strength tests and 3×10m sprints on-court. One-way ANOVAs compared performance differences between groups (LP, HP, Females, Males, No-trunk (NT), Trunk (TR)). Female-LP-players had significantly lower scores than Male-LP-players on elbow flexion (-47%), push (-46%) and pull (-37%) strength. Female-HP-NT-players had significantly lower scores than Male-HP-NT-players on elbow flexion (-64%), shoulder flexion (-56%), shoulder extension (-52%), push (-61%) and pull (-56%) strength. Female-HP-TR-players had significantly lower scores than Male-HP-TR-players on elbow flexion (-54%), shoulder flexion (-66%) and push (-66%) strength. No differences were found between sexes in 10m sprints, but sprint momentum showed clear differences. Female WR players had less strength compared to males, with more pronounced differences in HP-players. This strength disparity has direct implications on current international regulations, supporting compensation through competition rules.

Journal of Sports Sciences
Loughborough University (GB), Bamenda University of Science and Technology (CM)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.