Challenges of interpreting geodetic deformation in low strain rate regions: Insights from the 2021 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si2.svg" display="inline" id="d1e302"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:

Interseismic deformation and strain rates derived from Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) or Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data are often used to assess a fault’s earthquake potential. Deformation rates, commonly derived from short-term geodetic observations, are assumed to be indicative of long-term strain accumulation, and variations in strain rate throughout the interseismic period are poorly studied. Many regions have limited spatial and temporal coverage of GNSS data, and using InSAR presents challenges on low strain rate faults, where the signal-to-noise ratio is low. As a case study, we examine the interseismic period prior to a large intraplate left-lateral strike-slip earthquake: the 2021 M W 7.4 Maduo Earthquake. Using InSAR, we derive eastward velocities and maximum shear strain rates, whilst minimising the influence of near-field GNSS data, for two-year, three-year and six-year time periods. We investigate the sensitivity of geodetic deformation rate to the temporal observation window, and find that transient variations in deformation vary in a spatial pattern that cannot be unequivocally attributed to tectonic motion, given the uncertainty of InSAR data in the region. We do, however, observe a consistently low strain rate on the seismogenic fault. This study highlights the challenges faced when trying to obtain meaningful geodetic measurements on low strain rate faults, bringing to question the utility of strain rate as a proxy for seismic hazard in continental block interiors. • InSAR and GNSS data constrain strain rate in several observation windows prior to the 2021 Maduo earthquake. • Low strain rates are consistently observed on the seismogenic fault, irrespective of observation window. • Changing the observation window leads to fluctuations in deformation rates that can not be unequivocally attributed to tectonic motion given the signal-to-noise ratio of InSAR in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tectonophysics
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2026.231170
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges of interpreting geodetic deformation in low strain rate regions: Insights from the 2021 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si2.svg" display="inline" id="d1e302"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:

J. H. Johnson, Qi Ou, Conor Rutland, Lidong Bie et al.
Tectonophysics
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Challenges of interpreting geodetic deformation in low strain rate regions: Insights from the 2021 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si2.svg" display="inline" id="d1e302"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:

J. H. Johnson, Qi Ou, Conor Rutland, Lidong Bie, Zoë K. Mildon
article en

Abstract

Interseismic deformation and strain rates derived from Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) or Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data are often used to assess a fault’s earthquake potential. Deformation rates, commonly derived from short-term geodetic observations, are assumed to be indicative of long-term strain accumulation, and variations in strain rate throughout the interseismic period are poorly studied. Many regions have limited spatial and temporal coverage of GNSS data, and using InSAR presents challenges on low strain rate faults, where the signal-to-noise ratio is low. As a case study, we examine the interseismic period prior to a large intraplate left-lateral strike-slip earthquake: the 2021 M W 7.4 Maduo Earthquake. Using InSAR, we derive eastward velocities and maximum shear strain rates, whilst minimising the influence of near-field GNSS data, for two-year, three-year and six-year time periods. We investigate the sensitivity of geodetic deformation rate to the temporal observation window, and find that transient variations in deformation vary in a spatial pattern that cannot be unequivocally attributed to tectonic motion, given the uncertainty of InSAR data in the region. We do, however, observe a consistently low strain rate on the seismogenic fault. This study highlights the challenges faced when trying to obtain meaningful geodetic measurements on low strain rate faults, bringing to question the utility of strain rate as a proxy for seismic hazard in continental block interiors. • InSAR and GNSS data constrain strain rate in several observation windows prior to the 2021 Maduo earthquake. • Low strain rates are consistently observed on the seismogenic fault, irrespective of observation window. • Changing the observation window leads to fluctuations in deformation rates that can not be unequivocally attributed to tectonic motion given the signal-to-noise ratio of InSAR in the region.

TectonophysicsVol. 929
University of East Anglia (GB), Norwich Research Park (GB), University of Plymouth (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.