On the Future of Teams Research: A Letter to Team-Would

This article is a satirical letter to Team-would, the great-nephew of C.S. Lewis’ infamous devil Screwtape. Whereas Screwtape was tasked with corrupting a specific young man, Team-would is tasked with corrupting academics – especially teams researchers. The article suggests that this task can be accomplished in three easy steps: 1) entrap; 2) distract; and 3) obfuscate. Like other satirical pieces, this article is crafted to serve as constructive social criticism that challenges existing norms (e.g., selection and socialization) and structures (e.g., reward and task structures). It also strives to make uncomfortable topics easier to discuss (e.g., by introducing the Sufficiency Serpent and Generalizability Gremlin). Ultimately, we can choose whether to hike uphill and advance team science in service to society, or to follow the slippery slope toward an incoherent system that exists only to sustain itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Group Research
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964261430372
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Future of Teams Research: A Letter to Team-Would

Margaret M. Luciano
Small Group Research
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

On the Future of Teams Research: A Letter to Team-Would

Margaret M. Luciano
article en

Abstract

This article is a satirical letter to Team-would, the great-nephew of C.S. Lewis’ infamous devil Screwtape. Whereas Screwtape was tasked with corrupting a specific young man, Team-would is tasked with corrupting academics – especially teams researchers. The article suggests that this task can be accomplished in three easy steps: 1) entrap; 2) distract; and 3) obfuscate. Like other satirical pieces, this article is crafted to serve as constructive social criticism that challenges existing norms (e.g., selection and socialization) and structures (e.g., reward and task structures). It also strives to make uncomfortable topics easier to discuss (e.g., by introducing the Sufficiency Serpent and Generalizability Gremlin). Ultimately, we can choose whether to hike uphill and advance team science in service to society, or to follow the slippery slope toward an incoherent system that exists only to sustain itself.

Small Group Research
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.