The functional foetal brain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This work examines functional magnetic resonance imaging and foetal magnetoencephalography studies that measure foetal auditory and visual evoked responses during the third trimester of gestation. A prior study (Dunn et al., 2015) found inconsistent results in healthy human samples due to substantial methodological variability. The updated review also includes studies where participants are at risk of, or are already showing, atypical development. This gives a broader understanding of how and when sensory abilities develop and in which way their development is influenced by foetal and maternal risk factors. 46 studies were included from initial 528 reports. They demonstrate that auditory stimuli activate primarily temporal areas whereas visual stimuli activate only frontal regions. They also show that latencies and amplitudes of foetal evoked responses are comparable between both modalities, but are negatively affected by atypical development. Several stimulus and paradigm characteristics further moderate latency and amplitude values modality specific. Due to insufficient data regarding the gestational age, it remains inconclusive how age affects latencies and amplitudes. Older foetuses show, however, increased response rates and decreased latencies compared to younger foetuses, independent of modality. Key recommendations relate to improving data quality and comparability between studies. This will enable the development of clinical assessment tools in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101708
Primary Topic
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The functional foetal brain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kirsty Dunn, Leonie Loehn, Michelle To, Vincent Michael Reid
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
article

The functional foetal brain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kirsty Dunn, Leonie Loehn, Michelle To, Vincent Michael Reid
article en

Abstract

This work examines functional magnetic resonance imaging and foetal magnetoencephalography studies that measure foetal auditory and visual evoked responses during the third trimester of gestation. A prior study (Dunn et al., 2015) found inconsistent results in healthy human samples due to substantial methodological variability. The updated review also includes studies where participants are at risk of, or are already showing, atypical development. This gives a broader understanding of how and when sensory abilities develop and in which way their development is influenced by foetal and maternal risk factors. 46 studies were included from initial 528 reports. They demonstrate that auditory stimuli activate primarily temporal areas whereas visual stimuli activate only frontal regions. They also show that latencies and amplitudes of foetal evoked responses are comparable between both modalities, but are negatively affected by atypical development. Several stimulus and paradigm characteristics further moderate latency and amplitude values modality specific. Due to insufficient data regarding the gestational age, it remains inconclusive how age affects latencies and amplitudes. Older foetuses show, however, increased response rates and decreased latencies compared to younger foetuses, independent of modality. Key recommendations relate to improving data quality and comparability between studies. This will enable the development of clinical assessment tools in the future.

Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceVol. 79
University of Waikato (NZ), Lancaster University (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.