Probabilistic techno-economic assessment of large-scale anaerobic digestion plants for biomethane production: de-risking biomethane futures

• Probabilistic techno-economic analysis of 10, 20 and 40 GWh biomethane plants. • 40 GWh plant achieves highest return (22%) and lowest cost (0.091 €/kWh). • Economies of scale reduce grid and upgrading costs at larger plant sizes. • Biomethane price dominates profitability, while feedstock cost drives energy cost. • Uncertainty analysis shows larger plants increase positive NPV probability (77–85%). This study investigates the economic feasibility and profitability of large-scale biomethane production through anaerobic digestion (AD) at plant capacities of 10, 20, and 40 GWh, using grass silage and cattle slurry as feedstocks. A robust deterministic and probabilistic modelling approach was employed to evaluate essential financial indicators, including Levelized Cost of Biomethane (LCOB), Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Payback Period (PBP). Sensitivity analysis observed at changes in the costs of grass silage (±30%) and biomethane (±50%). A Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations assessed at uncertainty by figuring out mean values, the chance of a positive NPV, and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR). The results show that there is a good link between scale and financial performance. The cost of capital expenditures (CAPEX) ranged from €2.9 million for 10 GWh to €7.9 million for 40 GWh. As the scale of the plant grew, the cost of modifications and grid connections went down. The 40 GWh AD plant exhibited the strongest performance, achieving an NPV of approximately €22.2 million, an IRR of 30%, an LCOB of 0.079 €/kWh (≈ €0.79/Nm 3 ), and a payback period of 3.2 years, whereas the 10 GWh plant delivered a lower IRR of 16% and a longer payback period of 6.7 years. A probabilistic investigation confirmed that larger investments are more resilient, with the probability of a positive NPV rising from 81% to 92%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121316
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic techno-economic assessment of large-scale anaerobic digestion plants for biomethane production: de-risking biomethane futures

Cathal Geoghegan, Shivali Sahota, Cathal O’Donoghue
Energy Conversion and Management
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Probabilistic techno-economic assessment of large-scale anaerobic digestion plants for biomethane production: de-risking biomethane futures

Cathal Geoghegan, Shivali Sahota, Cathal O’Donoghue
article en

Abstract

• Probabilistic techno-economic analysis of 10, 20 and 40 GWh biomethane plants. • 40 GWh plant achieves highest return (22%) and lowest cost (0.091 €/kWh). • Economies of scale reduce grid and upgrading costs at larger plant sizes. • Biomethane price dominates profitability, while feedstock cost drives energy cost. • Uncertainty analysis shows larger plants increase positive NPV probability (77–85%). This study investigates the economic feasibility and profitability of large-scale biomethane production through anaerobic digestion (AD) at plant capacities of 10, 20, and 40 GWh, using grass silage and cattle slurry as feedstocks. A robust deterministic and probabilistic modelling approach was employed to evaluate essential financial indicators, including Levelized Cost of Biomethane (LCOB), Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Payback Period (PBP). Sensitivity analysis observed at changes in the costs of grass silage (±30%) and biomethane (±50%). A Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations assessed at uncertainty by figuring out mean values, the chance of a positive NPV, and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR). The results show that there is a good link between scale and financial performance. The cost of capital expenditures (CAPEX) ranged from €2.9 million for 10 GWh to €7.9 million for 40 GWh. As the scale of the plant grew, the cost of modifications and grid connections went down. The 40 GWh AD plant exhibited the strongest performance, achieving an NPV of approximately €22.2 million, an IRR of 30%, an LCOB of 0.079 €/kWh (≈ €0.79/Nm 3 ), and a payback period of 3.2 years, whereas the 10 GWh plant delivered a lower IRR of 16% and a longer payback period of 6.7 years. A probabilistic investigation confirmed that larger investments are more resilient, with the probability of a positive NPV rising from 81% to 92%.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 356
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.