Evaluating the Feasibility of Two Reduced Sulfur Compounds as Energy Sources and Electron Donors for Partial Autotrophic Denitrification: Thiocyanate and Sulfite

Autotrophic denitrification using sulfur compounds is considered an alternative to heterotrophic denitrification for the treatment of organic carbon-deficient wastewaters. However, the stoichiometric characteristics of denitrification using different sulfur species, particularly thiocyanate (SCN−) and sulfite (SO32−), remain poorly understood. Here, partial autotrophic denitrification driven by thiocyanate or sulfite was studied in two batch reactors. The stoichiometry of thiocyanate-oxidizing denitrification was assessed based on valence and ultimate product analysis. No nitrate removal was observed in the sulfite-fed system, indicating that sulfite could not serve as an effective electron donor for autotrophic denitrification under the tested conditions. In contrast, simultaneous removal of SCN− and NO3− was achieved in the thiocyanate-fed system, with removal efficiencies of 100% and 92.5 ± 3.6%, respectively. After 36 h, total nitrogen removal reached 63.3%, with nitrite identified as the dominant intermediate product (26.7%). NO2− and NH4+ accumulated during the process could be further removed through anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Thiocyanate sulfur was primarily oxidized to sulfate via elemental sulfur as a transient intermediate. These findings provide a theoretical basis for applying thiocyanate-driven partial autotrophic denitrification to nitrogen removal from industrial wastewaters, particularly those generated via coal gasification and cyanide-utilizing gold mining processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18060705
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Feasibility of Two Reduced Sulfur Compounds as Energy Sources and Electron Donors for Partial Autotrophic Denitrification: Thiocyanate and Sulfite

Chang Cui, Zixuan Xin, Guihua Xu, Chaoyue Li et al.
Water
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
article

Evaluating the Feasibility of Two Reduced Sulfur Compounds as Energy Sources and Electron Donors for Partial Autotrophic Denitrification: Thiocyanate and Sulfite

Chang Cui, Zixuan Xin, Guihua Xu, Chaoyue Li, Yanping Zhang
article en

Abstract

Autotrophic denitrification using sulfur compounds is considered an alternative to heterotrophic denitrification for the treatment of organic carbon-deficient wastewaters. However, the stoichiometric characteristics of denitrification using different sulfur species, particularly thiocyanate (SCN−) and sulfite (SO32−), remain poorly understood. Here, partial autotrophic denitrification driven by thiocyanate or sulfite was studied in two batch reactors. The stoichiometry of thiocyanate-oxidizing denitrification was assessed based on valence and ultimate product analysis. No nitrate removal was observed in the sulfite-fed system, indicating that sulfite could not serve as an effective electron donor for autotrophic denitrification under the tested conditions. In contrast, simultaneous removal of SCN− and NO3− was achieved in the thiocyanate-fed system, with removal efficiencies of 100% and 92.5 ± 3.6%, respectively. After 36 h, total nitrogen removal reached 63.3%, with nitrite identified as the dominant intermediate product (26.7%). NO2− and NH4+ accumulated during the process could be further removed through anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Thiocyanate sulfur was primarily oxidized to sulfate via elemental sulfur as a transient intermediate. These findings provide a theoretical basis for applying thiocyanate-driven partial autotrophic denitrification to nitrogen removal from industrial wastewaters, particularly those generated via coal gasification and cyanide-utilizing gold mining processes.

WaterVol. 18(6)
Beijing Technology and Business University (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.