Necrotizing (Abscessing) Lymphadenopathy and the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): A Review with Clinical Vignettes

Necrotizing (abscessing) lymphadenopathy is a clinically relevant condition with a broad differential diagnosis, including acute bacterial infections, mycobacterial disease, zoonoses, fungal and parasitic infections, autoimmune disorders, and malignancies with central necrosis. Early and reliable differentiation between these causes is important to avoid misdiagnosis and to guide appropriate therapy. This review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms, typical imaging features, and diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in necrotizing lymphadenopathy. Representative clinical vignettes illustrate the disease spectrum and correlate CEUS patterns with underlying pathology. The literature review was narrative and based on targeted searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar focusing on CEUS in necrotizing lymphadenopathy. A brief literature overview highlights current evidence, limitations, and research gaps. Conventional B-mode ultrasound (BMUS) and Doppler typically demonstrate enlarged hypoechoic or heterogeneous nodes with reduced central vascularity but lack specificity for necrosis. CEUS provides real-time visualization of nodal microvascular perfusion, which may support clearer differentiation between viable tissue and necrotic or abscess cavities. Common but non-specific CEUS patterns include central non-enhancement with a peripheral hyperemic rim in abscesses, irregular avascular cores in tuberculous lymphadenopathy, patchy non-enhancing areas in autoimmune conditions, and heterogeneous enhancement with ill-defined necrosis in malignant nodes. CEUS can support biopsy targeting, facilitate drainage procedures, and enable radiation-free follow-up. CEUS may offer diagnostic and interventional advantages in the evaluation of necrotizing lymphadenopathy, offering more consistent characterization of nodal necrosis compared with conventional sonography. While most evidence focuses on tuberculosis and malignancy, growing experience with zoonotic and autoimmune diseases suggests broader utility. Most currently available evidence derives from observational studies and small case series, highlighting the need for prospective multicenter validation. Standardization of CEUS criteria, integration into multiparametric ultrasound protocols, and multicenter validation are needed to establish CEUS as a routine component in the diagnostic work-up of necrotizing lymphadenopathy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16060888
Primary Topic
Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Necrotizing (Abscessing) Lymphadenopathy and the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): A Review with Clinical Vignettes

Michael Kallenbach, Nitin Chaubal, Christian Jenssen, Christian Görg et al.
Diagnostics
Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
article

Necrotizing (Abscessing) Lymphadenopathy and the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): A Review with Clinical Vignettes

Michael Kallenbach, Nitin Chaubal, Christian Jenssen, Christian Görg, Kathleen Möller, Christoph F. Dietrich, Yi Dong, Findeisen Hajo, Görg Friedemann
article en

Abstract

Necrotizing (abscessing) lymphadenopathy is a clinically relevant condition with a broad differential diagnosis, including acute bacterial infections, mycobacterial disease, zoonoses, fungal and parasitic infections, autoimmune disorders, and malignancies with central necrosis. Early and reliable differentiation between these causes is important to avoid misdiagnosis and to guide appropriate therapy. This review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms, typical imaging features, and diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in necrotizing lymphadenopathy. Representative clinical vignettes illustrate the disease spectrum and correlate CEUS patterns with underlying pathology. The literature review was narrative and based on targeted searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar focusing on CEUS in necrotizing lymphadenopathy. A brief literature overview highlights current evidence, limitations, and research gaps. Conventional B-mode ultrasound (BMUS) and Doppler typically demonstrate enlarged hypoechoic or heterogeneous nodes with reduced central vascularity but lack specificity for necrosis. CEUS provides real-time visualization of nodal microvascular perfusion, which may support clearer differentiation between viable tissue and necrotic or abscess cavities. Common but non-specific CEUS patterns include central non-enhancement with a peripheral hyperemic rim in abscesses, irregular avascular cores in tuberculous lymphadenopathy, patchy non-enhancing areas in autoimmune conditions, and heterogeneous enhancement with ill-defined necrosis in malignant nodes. CEUS can support biopsy targeting, facilitate drainage procedures, and enable radiation-free follow-up. CEUS may offer diagnostic and interventional advantages in the evaluation of necrotizing lymphadenopathy, offering more consistent characterization of nodal necrosis compared with conventional sonography. While most evidence focuses on tuberculosis and malignancy, growing experience with zoonotic and autoimmune diseases suggests broader utility. Most currently available evidence derives from observational studies and small case series, highlighting the need for prospective multicenter validation. Standardization of CEUS criteria, integration into multiparametric ultrasound protocols, and multicenter validation are needed to establish CEUS as a routine component in the diagnostic work-up of necrotizing lymphadenopathy.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(6)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), XinHua Hospital (CN), Jaslok Hospital (IN), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg (DE), Krankenhaus Märkisch-Oderland (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.