Transcranial electrical stimulation for the treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder: a triple meta-analysis

Abstract Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a condition with substantial disability and subclinical obsessive–compulsive behaviors affect up to 1 billion people globally. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is emerging as a potential treatment for OCD, yet its effectiveness is uncertain due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials conducted so far. Here we applied 3 meta-analytic approaches to evaluate the pooled therapeutic effect size of included randomized controlled trials ( n tDCS = 15, n tACS = 1) (pair-wise meta-analysis), compare the efficacy of various tES interventions (network meta-analysis), and explore how treatment effect size correlates with induced electrical field in the target brain regions (meta-modeling). With these 3 distinct meta-analytic approaches, we first show a significant moderate effect of tES interventions (standardized mean difference 0.61; 95% confidence interval [0.37 to 0.85]; P < 0.001) as a whole on reducing OCD severity, with larger therapeutic effects of twice-daily intervention, and with other stimulation parameters also moderating efficacy. Next, we identify specific tES interventions with superior indicated and estimated effects, including entraining alpha frequency alternating stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex, excitability-diminishing cathodal stimulation over the supplementary motor area and orbitofrontal cortex, and excitability-enhancing anodal stimulation of the lateral prefrontal cortex. Finally, we show based on computational approaches that longer stimulation targeting the medial prefrontal and frontopolar cortices has greater therapeutic effects and suggest an optimized intervention accordingly. We finally discuss other potentially effective tES interventions according to the latest neurobiological theory of OCD. The results contribute to establishing the clinical efficacy of tES for OCD treatment while suggesting future studies to further evaluate current and future approaches to enhance the efficacy of interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Mental Health
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-026-00590-z
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transcranial electrical stimulation for the treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder: a triple meta-analysis

Stevan Nikolin, Zahra Vaziri, M. Wischnewski, Frank T. Padberg et al.
Nature Mental Health
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Transcranial electrical stimulation for the treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder: a triple meta-analysis

Stevan Nikolin, Zahra Vaziri, M. Wischnewski, Frank T. Padberg, Jérôme Brunelin, Amir-Homayun Hallajian, Alexander T. Sack, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Michael A. Nitsche, Michael Siniatchkin, André Aleman, Daniel M. Blumberger, Andre R. Brunoni, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Carmelo M. Vicario, Marom Bikson, Trevor W. Robbins, Mohammad Ali Salehinejad
article en

Abstract

Abstract Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a condition with substantial disability and subclinical obsessive–compulsive behaviors affect up to 1 billion people globally. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is emerging as a potential treatment for OCD, yet its effectiveness is uncertain due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials conducted so far. Here we applied 3 meta-analytic approaches to evaluate the pooled therapeutic effect size of included randomized controlled trials ( n tDCS = 15, n tACS = 1) (pair-wise meta-analysis), compare the efficacy of various tES interventions (network meta-analysis), and explore how treatment effect size correlates with induced electrical field in the target brain regions (meta-modeling). With these 3 distinct meta-analytic approaches, we first show a significant moderate effect of tES interventions (standardized mean difference 0.61; 95% confidence interval [0.37 to 0.85]; P < 0.001) as a whole on reducing OCD severity, with larger therapeutic effects of twice-daily intervention, and with other stimulation parameters also moderating efficacy. Next, we identify specific tES interventions with superior indicated and estimated effects, including entraining alpha frequency alternating stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex, excitability-diminishing cathodal stimulation over the supplementary motor area and orbitofrontal cortex, and excitability-enhancing anodal stimulation of the lateral prefrontal cortex. Finally, we show based on computational approaches that longer stimulation targeting the medial prefrontal and frontopolar cortices has greater therapeutic effects and suggest an optimized intervention accordingly. We finally discuss other potentially effective tES interventions according to the latest neurobiological theory of OCD. The results contribute to establishing the clinical efficacy of tES for OCD treatment while suggesting future studies to further evaluate current and future approaches to enhance the efficacy of interventions.

Nature Mental Health
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), University of Messina (IT), City College of New York (US), New South Wales Department of Health (AU), Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Toronto (CA), Bielefeld University (DE), University of Cambridge (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Maastricht University (NL), University of California San Diego (US), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), German Center for Infection Research (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Institute of Biomedical Science (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), RWTH Aachen University (DE), Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (DE)
RWTH Aachen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.