Adaptation and Validation of the Gluten-Free Perceived Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS-P-GF) and Its Association with Gluten-Free Diet Adherence Among Adults with Celiac Disease in Chile

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only effective treatment for celiac disease (CeD) but remains challenging due to structural and environmental barriers. Evidence on these determinants in Latin America is scarce. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Gluten-Free Perceived Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS-P-GF) for adults with CeD in Chile and examine its association with GFD adherence. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey (October 2023-January 2024) included adults (≥18 years) with biopsy- or serology-confirmed CeD (n = 233). The questionnaire collected sociodemographic and clinical data, assessed adherence using the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test (CDAT; good < 13, poor ≥ 13), and measured perceptions of home and supply food environments via the adapted NEMS-P-GF. Construct validity was tested using exploratory factor analysis and reliability with Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω. Associations with adherence were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U. <b>Results:</b> NEMS-P-GF domains showed adequate validity (KMO 0.71-0.81; Bartlett's <i>p</i> < 0.001) and acceptable-to-excellent reliability (α/ω = 0.70-0.90). Participants with good vs. poor adherence perceived more supportive environments, particularly at home (median 4.79 vs. 1.29; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and globally (1.72 vs. -7.25; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Supply environments were perceived as less supportive due to limited availability and high prices (median -3.68 and -7.78), with smaller differences between adherence groups (<i>p</i> = 0.018). <b>Conclusions:</b> Supportive home environments were strongly associated with better GFD adherence, while supply environments remained broadly restrictive, showing modest but significant differences between adherence groups. The NEMS-P-GF demonstrated preliminary evidence of good psychometric properties and offers a valid, context-sensitive tool to assess GF food environments and inform public health strategies for CeD populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18060929
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptation and Validation of the Gluten-Free Perceived Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS-P-GF) and Its Association with Gluten-Free Diet Adherence Among Adults with Celiac Disease in Chile

Danae Hermosilla-Llanca, Alejandra Parada, María Jesús Vega-Salas, Lorena Rodríguez Osiac et al.
Nutrients
Celiac Disease Research and Management
article

Adaptation and Validation of the Gluten-Free Perceived Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS-P-GF) and Its Association with Gluten-Free Diet Adherence Among Adults with Celiac Disease in Chile

Danae Hermosilla-Llanca, Alejandra Parada, María Jesús Vega-Salas, Lorena Rodríguez Osiac, Daniel Egaña Rojas, Attilio Rigotti, Loni Berkowitz
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only effective treatment for celiac disease (CeD) but remains challenging due to structural and environmental barriers. Evidence on these determinants in Latin America is scarce. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Gluten-Free Perceived Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS-P-GF) for adults with CeD in Chile and examine its association with GFD adherence. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey (October 2023-January 2024) included adults (≥18 years) with biopsy- or serology-confirmed CeD (n = 233). The questionnaire collected sociodemographic and clinical data, assessed adherence using the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test (CDAT; good < 13, poor ≥ 13), and measured perceptions of home and supply food environments via the adapted NEMS-P-GF. Construct validity was tested using exploratory factor analysis and reliability with Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω. Associations with adherence were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U. <b>Results:</b> NEMS-P-GF domains showed adequate validity (KMO 0.71-0.81; Bartlett's <i>p</i> < 0.001) and acceptable-to-excellent reliability (α/ω = 0.70-0.90). Participants with good vs. poor adherence perceived more supportive environments, particularly at home (median 4.79 vs. 1.29; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and globally (1.72 vs. -7.25; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Supply environments were perceived as less supportive due to limited availability and high prices (median -3.68 and -7.78), with smaller differences between adherence groups (<i>p</i> = 0.018). <b>Conclusions:</b> Supportive home environments were strongly associated with better GFD adherence, while supply environments remained broadly restrictive, showing modest but significant differences between adherence groups. The NEMS-P-GF demonstrated preliminary evidence of good psychometric properties and offers a valid, context-sensitive tool to assess GF food environments and inform public health strategies for CeD populations.

NutrientsVol. 18(6)
Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Hospital del Salvador (CL), University of Chile (CL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.