Can Money Buy Trust? Social Transfers and Trust During the Covid‐19 Pandemic

ABSTRACT The United States was among the countries that increased social spending the most during the pandemic, including by adopting new cash transfer schemes. Yet, little is known about the impact of these newly implemented or augmented benefits on citizen trust in public health institutions. Grounded in policy feedback literature and research on attitudinal spillover, we hypothesize that receiving social transfers during the pandemic increased trust in health institutions, with potentially heterogeneous effects across household income and political affiliation. Employing a difference‐in‐differences model and using the Understanding America Study dataset, we find no overall effect of receiving Stimulus Fund or SNAP benefits on trust in health institutions. However, we observe significant heterogeneity: Republicans—especially those with middle and high incomes—tend to decrease their trust after receiving the Stimulus Fund. Independents and respondents with other political affiliations also decrease trust after receiving the SNAP, although the estimates are only marginally statistically significant. Taken together, results suggest that while universalistic social policies are often believed to be broadly politically popular and generate positive feedback effects, their impacts may be limited or heterogeneous depending on political affiliation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies Journal
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70112
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Money Buy Trust? Social Transfers and Trust During the Covid‐19 Pandemic

Ashley Fox, Hyesang Noh
Policy Studies Journal
Social Capital and Networks
article

Can Money Buy Trust? Social Transfers and Trust During the Covid‐19 Pandemic

Ashley Fox, Hyesang Noh
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The United States was among the countries that increased social spending the most during the pandemic, including by adopting new cash transfer schemes. Yet, little is known about the impact of these newly implemented or augmented benefits on citizen trust in public health institutions. Grounded in policy feedback literature and research on attitudinal spillover, we hypothesize that receiving social transfers during the pandemic increased trust in health institutions, with potentially heterogeneous effects across household income and political affiliation. Employing a difference‐in‐differences model and using the Understanding America Study dataset, we find no overall effect of receiving Stimulus Fund or SNAP benefits on trust in health institutions. However, we observe significant heterogeneity: Republicans—especially those with middle and high incomes—tend to decrease their trust after receiving the Stimulus Fund. Independents and respondents with other political affiliations also decrease trust after receiving the SNAP, although the estimates are only marginally statistically significant. Taken together, results suggest that while universalistic social policies are often believed to be broadly politically popular and generate positive feedback effects, their impacts may be limited or heterogeneous depending on political affiliation.

Policy Studies Journal
University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.