Enhancing Commodity Futures Price Prediction With Geopolitical Risk Embedding: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models

ABSTRACT This study uses daily closing prices of nine Chinese commodity futures from 2015 to 2023 to analyze price fluctuations and improve prediction reliability. It compares traditional time series model (ARIMAX), benchmark deep learning models (LSTM, GRU), and generative adversarial networks (GAN, WGAN), while also exploring the impact of geopolitical risk (GPR). The results show that deep learning models outperform traditional methods. LSTM and GRU excel at capturing temporal features, while WGAN offers superior versatility and stability, addressing GAN prediction flaws. Including GPR enhances forecasting accuracy for most commodities, revealing a dynamic correlation between GPR and commodity prices, with significant variation across different commodities. This study provides empirical evidence for the use of deep learning in financial time series forecasting and highlights the role of geopolitical risks in futures markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Futures Markets
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.70096
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Commodity Futures Price Prediction With Geopolitical Risk Embedding: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models

Lulu Qin, Chao Yang, Yuan Li
Journal of Futures Markets
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Enhancing Commodity Futures Price Prediction With Geopolitical Risk Embedding: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models

Lulu Qin, Chao Yang, Yuan Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study uses daily closing prices of nine Chinese commodity futures from 2015 to 2023 to analyze price fluctuations and improve prediction reliability. It compares traditional time series model (ARIMAX), benchmark deep learning models (LSTM, GRU), and generative adversarial networks (GAN, WGAN), while also exploring the impact of geopolitical risk (GPR). The results show that deep learning models outperform traditional methods. LSTM and GRU excel at capturing temporal features, while WGAN offers superior versatility and stability, addressing GAN prediction flaws. Including GPR enhances forecasting accuracy for most commodities, revealing a dynamic correlation between GPR and commodity prices, with significant variation across different commodities. This study provides empirical evidence for the use of deep learning in financial time series forecasting and highlights the role of geopolitical risks in futures markets.

Journal of Futures Markets
Tongji University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing Commodity Futures Price Prediction With Geopolitical Risk Embedding: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models — Lulu Qin, Chao Yang, et al. · Journal of Futures Markets (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS