How the brain segments experience: ERP evidence of event boundaries enhancing memory formation in narratives

Event boundaries are known to have an impact on how discrete events are remembered; however, the neural mechanisms supporting memory for boundaries themselves remain poorly understood. This study investigated how both event boundaries and preceding information are processed and remembered while listening to naturalistically spoken narratives. We recorded participants' neural responses (event-related potentials) while they listened to stories where a critical word signaled either a predictable (no-event boundary) or an unpredictable (event boundary) action. Critical words in the boundary condition were better remembered than those in the no-event boundary condition and elicited a larger N400 amplitude. Crucially, a subsequent memory effect was observed only in the boundary condition, with remembered critical words eliciting more negative N400s than forgotten ones, highlighting the role of increased demands in conceptual semantic processing in episodic memory encoding. Furthermore, a retrograde subsequent memory effect emerged also exclusively in the boundary condition, with more negative amplitudes to critical words when preceding information was later remembered, consistent with the notion that boundaries trigger rapid reinstatement of a recently experienced event. These findings provide compelling evidence that event boundaries act as "cognitive anchor points" that enhance the encoding of new information and also contribute to the strengthening of recently encoded events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01399-0
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the brain segments experience: ERP evidence of event boundaries enhancing memory formation in narratives

Axel Mecklinger, Doruntinë Zogaj, Regine Bader
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Memory Processes and Influences
article

How the brain segments experience: ERP evidence of event boundaries enhancing memory formation in narratives

Axel Mecklinger, Doruntinë Zogaj, Regine Bader
article en

Abstract

Event boundaries are known to have an impact on how discrete events are remembered; however, the neural mechanisms supporting memory for boundaries themselves remain poorly understood. This study investigated how both event boundaries and preceding information are processed and remembered while listening to naturalistically spoken narratives. We recorded participants' neural responses (event-related potentials) while they listened to stories where a critical word signaled either a predictable (no-event boundary) or an unpredictable (event boundary) action. Critical words in the boundary condition were better remembered than those in the no-event boundary condition and elicited a larger N400 amplitude. Crucially, a subsequent memory effect was observed only in the boundary condition, with remembered critical words eliciting more negative N400s than forgotten ones, highlighting the role of increased demands in conceptual semantic processing in episodic memory encoding. Furthermore, a retrograde subsequent memory effect emerged also exclusively in the boundary condition, with more negative amplitudes to critical words when preceding information was later remembered, consistent with the notion that boundaries trigger rapid reinstatement of a recently experienced event. These findings provide compelling evidence that event boundaries act as "cognitive anchor points" that enhance the encoding of new information and also contribute to the strengthening of recently encoded events.

Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Saarland University (DE)
Cognitive Neuroscience Society
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.