The associations between quality of life and a five-day per week peritoneal dialysis prescription: A pilot randomized controlled study

BackgroundIncremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been recommended as a patient-focused prescription; however, its safety and potential clinical benefits are based on retrospective studies.MethodsWe conducted a pilot, randomized controlled study comparing 5-day versus 7-day/week PD in incident patients with preserved residual kidney function in three centers in Australia. Modality of PD accorded to patient and clinician preferences for both groups. Participants on 5-day PD were transitioned to daily PD if symptoms of uremia did not respond to an increase in dialysate volume, or if residual renal creatinine clearance fell to <50 L/week/1.73m<sup>2</sup>. Duration of the 5-day regimen, quality of life, and clinical outcomes were compared to standard treatment over 12 months.ResultsTwenty-four participants were randomized to 7-day (<i>n</i> = 13) or 5-day (<i>n</i> = 11) PD. At baseline, age, gender, diabetes prevalence, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were similar. The mean and median durations of the 5-day prescription were 8.4 ± 4.7 and 12 (IQR 5-12) months, respectively. On average, participants in the 5-day Group had 73 dialysis-free days/person and utilized less PD fluid (957 ± 218 vs. 1558 ± 436 L/person, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). No differences were observed in peritonitis (0.12 vs. 0.26 episodes/patient-year) or hospitalization (0.12 vs. 0.09 episodes/patient-year) rates between 5- and 7-day groups, respectively. Although physical, mental, and kidney-disease composite scores were comparable between groups, sleep quality and patient satisfaction were higher in the 5-day Group.ConclusionIncremental PD was feasible in patients with preserved residual kidney function in the first year of dialysis and was not associated with more complications compared with daily PD. Differences observed in sleep quality of treatment satisfaction are hypothesis-generating and warrant further evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608261432149
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The associations between quality of life and a five-day per week peritoneal dialysis prescription: A pilot randomized controlled study

Louis Huang, Peter F. Mount, Catherine Brumby, Peter Kerr et al.
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

The associations between quality of life and a five-day per week peritoneal dialysis prescription: A pilot randomized controlled study

Louis Huang, Peter F. Mount, Catherine Brumby, Peter Kerr, Matthew A. Roberts, Fiona G. Brown, Lawrence P. McMahon, Matthew RP Davies
article en

Abstract

BackgroundIncremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been recommended as a patient-focused prescription; however, its safety and potential clinical benefits are based on retrospective studies.MethodsWe conducted a pilot, randomized controlled study comparing 5-day versus 7-day/week PD in incident patients with preserved residual kidney function in three centers in Australia. Modality of PD accorded to patient and clinician preferences for both groups. Participants on 5-day PD were transitioned to daily PD if symptoms of uremia did not respond to an increase in dialysate volume, or if residual renal creatinine clearance fell to <50 L/week/1.73m<sup>2</sup>. Duration of the 5-day regimen, quality of life, and clinical outcomes were compared to standard treatment over 12 months.ResultsTwenty-four participants were randomized to 7-day (<i>n</i> = 13) or 5-day (<i>n</i> = 11) PD. At baseline, age, gender, diabetes prevalence, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were similar. The mean and median durations of the 5-day prescription were 8.4 ± 4.7 and 12 (IQR 5-12) months, respectively. On average, participants in the 5-day Group had 73 dialysis-free days/person and utilized less PD fluid (957 ± 218 vs. 1558 ± 436 L/person, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). No differences were observed in peritonitis (0.12 vs. 0.26 episodes/patient-year) or hospitalization (0.12 vs. 0.09 episodes/patient-year) rates between 5- and 7-day groups, respectively. Although physical, mental, and kidney-disease composite scores were comparable between groups, sleep quality and patient satisfaction were higher in the 5-day Group.ConclusionIncremental PD was feasible in patients with preserved residual kidney function in the first year of dialysis and was not associated with more complications compared with daily PD. Differences observed in sleep quality of treatment satisfaction are hypothesis-generating and warrant further evaluation.

Peritoneal Dialysis International
The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.