Testing Five Nonlinear Equations for Quantifying Leaf Area Inequality of Semiarundinaria densiflora

Accurately quantifying the inequality of plant organ size distributions, such as leaf area, is essential for understanding plant resource allocation strategies, and this is commonly achieved using Lorenz curves. Previous studies have shown that the performance equation (PE) and its generalized form (GPE) effectively describe Lorenz curves that are rotated 135° counterclockwise around the origin and shifted rightward by 2 units. However, few studies have compared the fitting performance of PE (and GPE) with other traditional equations generating Lorenz curves in modeling empirical leaf area distributions, and even fewer have considered the validity of linear approximation assumptions in these nonlinear models. To address this gap, we quantified the inequality of leaf area distributions in Semiarundinaria densiflora, a bamboo species for which the abundant and measurable leaves per culm provide an ideal system for examining the ecological strategies underlying leaf allocation patterns. Five nonlinear models were employed to fit the leaf area distribution: PE, GPE, the Sarabia equation (SarabiaE), the Sarabia–Castillo–Slottje equation (SCSE), and the Sitthiyot–Holasut equation (SHE). Model performance was assessed using root-mean-square error (RMSE) and Akaike information criterion (AIC), while nonlinearity curvature measures were applied to evaluate the close-to-linear behavior of parameter estimates. In addition, the Lorenz asymmetry coefficient (LAC) was used to quantify the asymmetry of the Lorenz curves. Our results showed a clear trade-off between predictive accuracy and linear approximation behavior. Among the five models, GPE achieved the best fit, with the lowest RMSE and AIC values, yet did not show good close-to-linear behavior. In contrast, SHE provided the poorest fit but demonstrated the strongest close-to-linear properties. LAC values indicated that relatively abundant, larger leaves disproportionately contributed to the inequality in leaf area distribution. These findings highlight an inherent trade-off in using Lorenz-based models to describe leaf area frequency distributions: predictive accuracy does not necessarily align with statistical validity. By integrating model fit, nonlinearity diagnostics, and asymmetry assessment, this study provides new perspectives and methodological tools for future investigations into inequality in plant organ size distributions and their ecological significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18030501
Primary Topic
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing Five Nonlinear Equations for Quantifying Leaf Area Inequality of Semiarundinaria densiflora

L. Wang, Hanzhou Qiu, J. F. Gielis
Symmetry
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
article

Testing Five Nonlinear Equations for Quantifying Leaf Area Inequality of Semiarundinaria densiflora

L. Wang, Hanzhou Qiu, J. F. Gielis
article en

Abstract

Accurately quantifying the inequality of plant organ size distributions, such as leaf area, is essential for understanding plant resource allocation strategies, and this is commonly achieved using Lorenz curves. Previous studies have shown that the performance equation (PE) and its generalized form (GPE) effectively describe Lorenz curves that are rotated 135° counterclockwise around the origin and shifted rightward by 2 units. However, few studies have compared the fitting performance of PE (and GPE) with other traditional equations generating Lorenz curves in modeling empirical leaf area distributions, and even fewer have considered the validity of linear approximation assumptions in these nonlinear models. To address this gap, we quantified the inequality of leaf area distributions in Semiarundinaria densiflora, a bamboo species for which the abundant and measurable leaves per culm provide an ideal system for examining the ecological strategies underlying leaf allocation patterns. Five nonlinear models were employed to fit the leaf area distribution: PE, GPE, the Sarabia equation (SarabiaE), the Sarabia–Castillo–Slottje equation (SCSE), and the Sitthiyot–Holasut equation (SHE). Model performance was assessed using root-mean-square error (RMSE) and Akaike information criterion (AIC), while nonlinearity curvature measures were applied to evaluate the close-to-linear behavior of parameter estimates. In addition, the Lorenz asymmetry coefficient (LAC) was used to quantify the asymmetry of the Lorenz curves. Our results showed a clear trade-off between predictive accuracy and linear approximation behavior. Among the five models, GPE achieved the best fit, with the lowest RMSE and AIC values, yet did not show good close-to-linear behavior. In contrast, SHE provided the poorest fit but demonstrated the strongest close-to-linear properties. LAC values indicated that relatively abundant, larger leaves disproportionately contributed to the inequality in leaf area distribution. These findings highlight an inherent trade-off in using Lorenz-based models to describe leaf area frequency distributions: predictive accuracy does not necessarily align with statistical validity. By integrating model fit, nonlinearity diagnostics, and asymmetry assessment, this study provides new perspectives and methodological tools for future investigations into inequality in plant organ size distributions and their ecological significance.

SymmetryVol. 18(3)
University of Antwerp (BE), Nanjing Forestry University (CN), Antwerp Management School (BE), Ningde Normal University (CN)
Nanjing Forestry University
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.