Dialogism and Rhetorical Listening in an Age of Polarization

Using the author’s course on the memoirs of Israelis and Palestinians as an illustration, this article argues that dialogism and rhetorical listening can offer alternatives to the increasingly more common oppositional discourses found within and outside of academia after October 7, 2023, and since President Trump took office on January 20, 2025. The article describes how political and social divisions have made their way into higher education, resulting in some professors electing for a “silent” classroom while others take a more “activist” approach. It argues that both pedagogical choices present challenges for a liberal education in which the goal is debate and discussion across and despite difference. The article briefly describes the polarization occurring in the relevant fields of Israel Studies, Jewish Studies, and Holocaust Studies. It then acknowledges the author’s own personal and professional positionings. The article concludes with a description of the author’s course text selection and assignment design, including a discussion of how these aligned with pedagogical methods and goals informed by dialogism and rhetorical listening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Literary Humanities
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7912/cgp/a361
Primary Topic
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialogism and Rhetorical Listening in an Age of Polarization

Daphne Desser
The International Journal of Literary Humanities
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
article

Dialogism and Rhetorical Listening in an Age of Polarization

Daphne Desser
article en

Abstract

Using the author’s course on the memoirs of Israelis and Palestinians as an illustration, this article argues that dialogism and rhetorical listening can offer alternatives to the increasingly more common oppositional discourses found within and outside of academia after October 7, 2023, and since President Trump took office on January 20, 2025. The article describes how political and social divisions have made their way into higher education, resulting in some professors electing for a “silent” classroom while others take a more “activist” approach. It argues that both pedagogical choices present challenges for a liberal education in which the goal is debate and discussion across and despite difference. The article briefly describes the polarization occurring in the relevant fields of Israel Studies, Jewish Studies, and Holocaust Studies. It then acknowledges the author’s own personal and professional positionings. The article concludes with a description of the author’s course text selection and assignment design, including a discussion of how these aligned with pedagogical methods and goals informed by dialogism and rhetorical listening.

The International Journal of Literary Humanities
University of Hawaii System (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dialogism and Rhetorical Listening in an Age of Polarization — Daphne Desser · The International Journal of Literary Humanities (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS